|
Miltenyi Biotec
apc ccr2 miltenyi biotech Apc Ccr2 Miltenyi Biotech, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/apc ccr2 miltenyi biotech/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc ccr2 miltenyi biotech - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
mcp Mcp, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mcp/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
goat polyclonal anti mcp 1 antibody Goat Polyclonal Anti Mcp 1 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/goat polyclonal anti mcp 1 antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat polyclonal anti mcp 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio X Cell
anti ccl2 antibody ![]() Anti Ccl2 Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ccl2 antibody/product/Bio X Cell Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ccl2 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
recombinant human ccl2 standards ![]() Recombinant Human Ccl2 Standards, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human ccl2 standards/product/R&D Systems Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human ccl2 standards - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
murine ccl2 protein levels ![]() Murine Ccl2 Protein Levels, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/murine ccl2 protein levels/product/R&D Systems Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
murine ccl2 protein levels - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
human mcp 1 ![]() Human Mcp 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human mcp 1/product/R&D Systems Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mcp 1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
recombinant ccl2 protein ![]() Recombinant Ccl2 Protein, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant ccl2 protein/product/R&D Systems Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant ccl2 protein - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
ccl2 ![]() Ccl2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/ccl2/product/R&D Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ccl2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
recombinant mouse ccl2 je mcp 1 ccl2 ![]() Recombinant Mouse Ccl2 Je Mcp 1 Ccl2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant mouse ccl2 je mcp 1 ccl2/product/R&D Systems Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse ccl2 je mcp 1 ccl2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
recombinant mouse mcp 1 ![]() Recombinant Mouse Mcp 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant mouse mcp 1/product/R&D Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse mcp 1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
mcp 1 ![]() Mcp 1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mcp 1/product/Novus Biologicals Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcp 1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Science Advances
Article Title: Immunosuppressive macrophages determine the effect of cellular senescence on tumor progression
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adx2988
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Tumor samples from mice treated with vehicle or AP21967 at 9 weeks were homogenized, and the levels of the indicated cytokines were analyzed using a cytokine array. The log 2 FC (AP21967/vehicle) for each cytokine is presented. ENA-78, epithelial-derived neutrophil-activating peptide 78; GROα, growth-regulated oncogene-alpha. ( B ) Levels of CCL2 and CXCL1 were quantified by ELISA from the same tumor homogenates as in (A). ( C ) UMAP plots showing the expression of the most up-regulated cytokines (CCL2, CCL3, and CCL7) and their receptors (CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5) in different cell populations. Relevant cell clusters are indicated. N, neutrophils; MØ, macrophages; E, endothelial cells; F, fibroblasts. ( D ) Flow cytometry analysis of myeloid cells purified from tumors obtained from SuSe mice treated with vehicle or AP21967. We identified TAMs and cells positive for the myeloid marker CD11B and for the macrophage marker F4/80. ( E ) The same cells as in (D) were cultured for 24 hours—in the presence of vehicle or anti-CCL2—and the presence of CCL2 in the conditioned medium was determined by ELISA. ( F ) Schematic representation of the specificities of receptors for CCL2, CCL3, and CCL7. ( G ) Flow cytometry analysis of CCR2 in the same cells as in (D). FSH-H, forward scatter height.
Article Snippet: For selective CCL2 blocking, 4-week-old PyMT/SuSe mice were treated every 3 days with
Techniques: Derivative Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Purification, Marker, Cell Culture
Journal: Journal of Cell Science
Article Title: Endothelial protective factors BMP9 and BMP10 inhibit CCL2 release by human vascular endothelial cells
doi: 10.1242/jcs.239715
Figure Lengend Snippet: BMP9 inhibits CCL2 expression and release by endothelial cells. Confluent HPAECs were serum-restricted for 16 h followed by treatment with BMP9 in 0.1% FBS. (A) HPAECs were treated with 1 ng/ml BMP9 for 2, 4, 8 or 12 h (3 experiments). Data show the fold change relative to 0.1% FBS at each time point. (B) HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (0-10 ng/ml) for 8 h (5 experiments). (C) HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (0-10 ng/ml) for 24 h. CCL2 immunoreactivity of conditioned media was normalized to cell number for each well ( n =4 wells per treatment) and is representative of 3 experiments. (D) HPAECs were treated with BMP10 (0-10 ng/ml) for 8 h (3 experiments). (E) HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (1 ng/ml) or BMP10 (1 ng/ml) for 24 h. CCL2 immunoreactivity of conditioned media was normalized to cell number for each well. Data ( n =4 wells per treatment) are representative of 3 experiments. (F,G) HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (1 ng/ml) or BMP10 (1 ng/ml) for 8 h and expression of CCL2 (F) and ID1 and ID2 (G) measured (6 experiments). (H,I) HAECs were treated with BMP9 (0-10 ng/ml) (H) or BMP10 (0-10 ng/ml) (I) for 8 h (3 experiments). All data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Expression data are normalised to ACTB and presented as the fold change relative to control. Significance was calculated using either one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD test (B,E-G) or Friedman multiple comparison test with post-hoc Dunn's analysis (C,D,H,I). * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001, compared with control (0.1% FBS without added BMP9 or BMP10).
Article Snippet: Samples (100 μl/well) and
Techniques: Expressing, Control, Comparison
Journal: Journal of Cell Science
Article Title: Endothelial protective factors BMP9 and BMP10 inhibit CCL2 release by human vascular endothelial cells
doi: 10.1242/jcs.239715
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reduction of ALK1 attenuates the induction of CCL2 by BMP9, and both ACTR-II and BMPR-II mediate the repression by BMP9 and BMP10. (A-C) HPAECs were transfected with siRNA for ALK1 (siA1), BMPR2 (siB2) or a non-targeting control pool (siCP) using DharmaFECT1 (DH1). (A) HPAECs were treated with 1 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 8 h. Expression of CCL2 was normalized to ACTB . Data show the fold change relative to DH1/0.1% FBS (4 experiments). (B) HPAECs were treated with 1 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 24 h. Conditioned media were collected, assayed for CCL2 by ELISA and normalized to cell number for each well. Data ( n =4 wells per treatment) are from a representative of 4 experiments. (C) Specific reduction of ALK1 and BMPR-II by their respective siRNAs was confirmed by western blotting, the numbers below the blots representing band density ratios relative to α-tubulin normalised to the DH1 control. Arrows indicate the positions of the molecular mass markers (kDa). (D-F) HPAECs were transfected with a non-targeting control siRNA pool (siCP) or siRNAs for ACVR2A (siA2A), BMPR2 (siB2) or both in combination (siA2AB2) using DharmaFECT1 (DH1). HPAECs were treated with 1 ng/ml BMP9 or BMP10 in 0.1% FBS for 8 h. Expression of ACTR-IIA ( ACVR2A ; D), BMPR-II ( BMPR2 ; E) and CCL2 (F) were normalized to ACTB . Data show the fold change relative to DH1/0.1% FBS (6 experiments). The key for D-F is provided in F. (G-I) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were pretreated with 250 nM LDN-193189 or 2µM SD208 for 1 h followed by 1 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 8 h for mRNA extraction. Expression of CCL2 (G), CXCL8 (H) and ID1 (I) were determined by qPCR and normalized to ACTB . qPCR data are presented as the fold change relative to the DMSO control (1:2500 in 0.1% FBS) (3 experiments). All data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Significance was calculated using either a paired Students t -test (A,B,G-I), comparing with 0.1% FBS control, or one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Sidak test (D-F), comparing with siCP of same treatment. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001.
Article Snippet: Samples (100 μl/well) and
Techniques: Transfection, Control, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Western Blot, Extraction
Journal: Journal of Cell Science
Article Title: Endothelial protective factors BMP9 and BMP10 inhibit CCL2 release by human vascular endothelial cells
doi: 10.1242/jcs.239715
Figure Lengend Snippet: CCL2 repression by BMP9 in HPAECs is dependent on Smad4, but not Smad2 or Smad3. (A) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were treated with 0.01-10 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 1 h. Protein lysates were immunoblotted for phospho-Smad1/5, Smad1, phospho-Smad2 or Smad2. Blots are representative of 4 experiments. (B) Quantification of the blots in A, calculated as the ratio of the density of the phospho-Smad band to the Smad band for each sample and normalised to the 0.1% FBS control. (C-E) HPAECs were transfected with SMAD4 siRNA (siS4) or a non-targeting control pool (siCP) using DharmaFECT1 (DH1). (C) Reduced Smad4 protein was confirmed by western blotting. (D) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were treated with 1 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 8 h (3 experiments). (E) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were treated with 1 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 24 h. CCL2 release was measured by ELISA and normalised to cell number. Data are from a representative of 3 experiments ( n =4 wells per treatment). (F,G) HPAECs were transfected with SMAD2 siRNA (siS2) or siCP using DH1 and treated with BMP9 for 8 h as described above. (F) CCL2 (top panel) and CXCL8 (bottom panel) expression (3 experiments). (G) Smad2 protein knockdown was confirmed by western blotting. (H,I) HPAECs were transfected with SMAD3 siRNA (siS3) or siCP using DH1 and treated with BMP9 for 8 h. (H) Smad3 protein knockdown was confirmed by western blotting. (I) CCL2 expression (3 experiments). For western blots, the migration positions of the relevant protein molecular mass markers (kDa) are indicated by arrows. The numbers below each blot panel represent band density ratios relative to α-tubulin normalised to the DH1 control. All data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Expression data are normalised to ACTB and presented as the fold change relative to DHI/0.1% FBS. Significance was calculated using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test. * P <0.05.
Article Snippet: Samples (100 μl/well) and
Techniques: Control, Transfection, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Knockdown, Migration
Journal: Journal of Cell Science
Article Title: Endothelial protective factors BMP9 and BMP10 inhibit CCL2 release by human vascular endothelial cells
doi: 10.1242/jcs.239715
Figure Lengend Snippet: CCL2 repression by BMP9 in HPAECs is not dependent on Smad1, Smad5 or Smad9. HPAECs were transfected with siRNAs for SMAD1 (siS1), SMAD5 (siS5) or SMAD9 (siS9) alone or in combination using DharmaFECT1 (DH1). In parallel, cells were transfected with a non-targeting control pool (siCP). (A,B) Knockdown of Smad1 and Smad5 were confirmed by western blotting of cells transfected with siRNAs targeting individual (A) and combinations (B) of Smads. The migration positions of the relevant protein molecular mass markers (kDa) are indicated by arrows. The numbers below each blot panel represent band density ratios relative to α-tubulin normalised to the DH1 control. (C-E) Transfected HPAECs were serum-restricted, followed by treatment with 1 ng/ml BMP9 in 0.1% FBS for 8 h. CCL2 expression (C) and ID2 and CXCL8 expression (D) were determined in cells in which individual Smads were knocked down (5 experiments). CCL2 and ID2 expression (E) were determined in HPAECs in which combinations of Smads were knocked down (4 experiments). (F) Transfected HPAECs were serum-restricted, followed by treatment with 0.3 ng/ml BMP9 or BMP10 in 0.1% FBS for 4h (5 experiments). All data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Expression data are normalised to ACTB and presented as the fold change relative to DH1/0.1% FBS. Significance was calculated using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD (C-E) or Sidak (F) test. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001. For CCL2 , data were compared with siCP/0.1% FBS. For ID2 and CXCL8 , data were compared with siCP/BMP9.
Article Snippet: Samples (100 μl/well) and
Techniques: Transfection, Control, Knockdown, Western Blot, Migration, Expressing
Journal: Journal of Cell Science
Article Title: Endothelial protective factors BMP9 and BMP10 inhibit CCL2 release by human vascular endothelial cells
doi: 10.1242/jcs.239715
Figure Lengend Snippet: BMP9 does not affect CCL2 induction by TNF-α in HPAECs and HAECs. (A) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (5 ng/ml) alone or with TNF-α (5 ng/ml) in 0.1% FBS for 6 h. Co-treatments were added without BMP9 pre-incubation or after 1 h or 16 h pre-incubation with 5 ng/ml BMP9 (3 experiments). (B) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (5 ng/ml) and TNF-α (5 ng/ml) in 0.1% FBS for 6 h. Conditioned media were assayed for CCL2 by ELISA. Data are from a representative of 3 experiments ( n =4 wells per treatment). (C) Confluent serum-restricted HPAECs were treated with BMP9 (0-5 ng/ml) and TNF-α (0-2 ng/ml) in 0.1% FBS for 6 h (4 experiments). (D,E) Confluent serum-restricted HAECs were treated with BMP9 (5 ng/ml) alone or with TNF-α (5 ng/ml) in 0.1% FBS for 6 h and assayed for CCL2 expression (D) (4 experiments) and CCL2 release (E). ELISA data are from a representative of 3 experiments ( n =4 wells per treatment). (F) Confluent serum-restricted HAECs were treated with BMP9 (0-5 ng/ml) and TNF-α (0-5 ng/ml) in 0.1% FBS for 6 h. All data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. Expression data are normalised to ACTB and presented as the fold change relative to 0.1% FBS (no additions). Significance was calculated using Friedman multiple comparisons test with post-hoc Dunn’s analysis. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001, compared with control (0.1% FBS).
Article Snippet: Samples (100 μl/well) and
Techniques: Incubation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Control
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Factor XIIIA—expressing inflammatory monocytes promote lung squamous cancer through fibrin cross-linking
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04355-w
Figure Lengend Snippet: Inflammatory monocytes associate with survival in LUSC. a Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival in lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC) patients split by median (left, p < 0.0001) and quartile (right, p = 0.0006) expression levels of CD14. P -values are obtained with the log-rank test; FDR were calculated according to Benjamini and Hochberg. b Proportion of patients by mRNA subtype that have CD14 expression levels above (red) or below (black) the median CD14 expression level. Binomial tests for proportions were performed. (Black asterisks: significant enrichment below the median, red asterisks: Significant enrichment above the median). c Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival in LUSC by expression levels of CCL2 ( p = 0.001), CCL3 ( p = 0.018) and CSF1 ( p = 0.015) expression. d Pearson’s correlations of CCL2, CCL3, and CSF1 chemokines versus CD14 (gene expression). e Dynamic range of mRNA expression of CD14 and CCL2 for each LUSC mRNA subtype. P -values were obtained with analysis of variance. The purple shading for CD14 expression represents samples in the ‘IM-rich subset’ (above the median CD14 expression level). f Dynamic range of mRNA expression of CCL3 and CSF1 by LUSC mRNA subtype. g Representative multiplex IHC for CD14 (green), CCR2 (red) and pan-cytokeratin (light blue) in a LUSC tumor sample, and enumeration of CD14+/CCR2+ cells in CK+ and CK- regions. #1-3 represent CK- regions, #4 represents a CK + region. Scale bar 100 μm. h Representative dual CD14+/CCR2+ cells (white arrows) in CK- (#1-3) and CK+ (#4) regions. Note: CK + region shown in white channel to more easily appreciate green and red. Scale bar 25 μm. i Enumeration of CD14+/CCR2+ cells in CK- and CK+ regions by mRNA subtype. Classical ( n = 14), Basal ( n = 9), Primitive ( n = 6) and Secretory ( n = 12). p -values were obtained with Student’s t-test in comparison to the Classical subtype. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.0001
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression, Multiplex Assay, Comparison
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Factor XIIIA—expressing inflammatory monocytes promote lung squamous cancer through fibrin cross-linking
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04355-w
Figure Lengend Snippet: TNFα activation of NFκB promotes CCL2-mediated IM recruitment. a Microarray expression data (left) comparing murine bronchial epithelial cells (MBECs), parental KLN205 and the LN4K1 sub-clone. Top upstream pathways (right) from Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) are shown for the differentially regulated genes shown in brackets. b An upstream network visualization from IPA of all over-expressed genes (all nodes) in the upper portion of the heat map shown in Fig. with significant log-rank (survival analysis) p -value ( < 0.05). TNFα and NFκB (blue nodes) were amongst the top upstream regulators known to have direct roles (black lines) in promoting CCL2, CCL3 and CSF1 chemokines (the degree of redness corresponds with increasing statistical significance). c Relative expression of TNFα. d CCL2, CCL3 and CSF1 by qPCR. Data are averages ± s.e.m. P -values were obtained with Student’s t-test in comparison with KLN205. e Relative levels of CCL2 as measured by ELISA from secreted media of cells growing in vitro or, f , from plasma of tumor-bearing mice. Data are averages ± s.e.m. g Relative mRNA expression of CCL2 and p65 in LN4K1 cells following treatment with control or p65 siRNA with or without exogenous TNFα (100 ng/mL). h Relative expression of CCL2 mRNA (top) and phospho-p65 and p65 protein (bottom) following treatment with DMSO or an IKKβ inhibitor (Compound A, 5 μM) for 5 h. i Relative IM counts in the bone marrow, blood, spleen from healthy DBA2 mice versus those with LN4K1 tumors. j Relative IM, TAM and TReg counts from the lungs of healthy versus LN4K1-bearing mice. IMs were also assessed in age-matched DBA2 mice following HBSS ‘Mock’ injection. P -values obtained with one-sided Student’s t-test, n = 5 mice/group for f , i , and j . * P < 0.05, ** P ≤0.01, *** P ≤0.001
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Activation Assay, Microarray, Expressing, Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, In Vitro, Clinical Proteomics, Control, Injection
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Factor XIIIA—expressing inflammatory monocytes promote lung squamous cancer through fibrin cross-linking
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04355-w
Figure Lengend Snippet: CCL2-mediated IM recruitment is critical for LUSC metastasis. a Relative expression of CCL2 for KLN205 and sub-clones. b Quantification of luciferase signal. c Representative images obtained 10 days after cell injection of (i) KLN205-Scr ORF, (ii) KLN205-CCL2 ORF, (iii) LN4K1-Cntrl shR, (iv) LN4K1-CCL2 shR#1 and (v) LN4K1-CCL2 shR#2. Data are averages ± s.e.m. P -values were obtained with Student’s t-test, n = 10 mice/group. d Survival plots of mice following tail vein injection of KLN205 cell lines. The black arrow indicates tissue harvest, n = 10 mice/group. e Number of IMs per lung lobe, n = 12 lobes/group. f Survival plots of mice following tail vein injection of LN4K1 cell lines. The black arrow indicates tissue harvest, n = 10 mice/group. g Number of IMs per lung lobe, n = 12 lobes/group. h Schematic (left) and quantification of luciferase signal (right) of mice treated with vehicle or PF-04136309 to assess effects on established metastases. i FACS plots and ( j ) quantification of percent IMs in the blood and ( k ) right lung of LN4K1-bearing mice. Data are averages ± s.e.m. P -values were obtained with Student’s t-test, n = 5 mice/group. l , FACS analysis of percent immune infiltrates for TAMs (gated on F480), DCs (gated on SiglecF-/CD11c), CD4, CD8, Tregs (gated on TCRb + ) and NK cells (gated on SiglecF-/B220-/TCRb-). m Schematic (left) and quantification of luciferase signal (right) of mice treated at the time of cell injection to assess effects on preventing metastasis. Data are averages ± s.e.m. P -values were obtained with Student’s t-test, n = 10 mice/group. n.s. = non-significant, * P ≤0.05, *** P < 0.001. For panel b , * FDR < 0.05, ** FDR < 0.01
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, Clone Assay, Luciferase, Injection
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Factor XIIIA—expressing inflammatory monocytes promote lung squamous cancer through fibrin cross-linking
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04355-w
Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic of the ‘IM-rich subset’ of lung squamous carcinoma. TNFα activation of the canonical NFκB leads to LUSC cell secretion of chemo-attractant CCL2, which stimulates the bone marrow to release inflammatory monocytes (IMs) into circulation. The IMs bring large payloads of FXIIIA into the tumor microenvironment, leading to cross-linked fibrin, LUSC invadopodia formation and progression
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Activation Assay
Journal:
Article Title: Protection against inflammation- and autoantibody-caused fetal loss by the chemokine decoy receptor D6
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607514104
Figure Lengend Snippet: Chemokines in the LPS model of fetal loss. (A–E) Serum chemokine concentrations after LPS treatment in WT and D6−/− male mice. WT (open symbols) and D6−/− (filled symbols) mice were injected i.p. with 1.35 mg/kg LPS. At the indicated time points, circulating chemokine concentrations were measured by ELISA. Data are from seven mice for each time point. (F–J) Serum chemokine concentrations. WT (open columns) and D6−/− (filled columns) mice at day 10 of pregnancy were injected i.p. with 0.4 mg/kg LPS. Circulating chemokine concentrations were measured at 8 h postinjection by ELISA. Data are from nine WT and eight D6−/− mice. (K–O) Chemokine levels in placenta. WT (open columns) and D6−/− (filled columns) mice at day 10 of pregnancy were injected i.p. with 0.4 mg/kg LPS. Chemokine concentrations (expressed as nanograms of chemokine per milligram of total proteins of the lysates) were measured at 8 h postinjection by ELISA. Data are from nine WT and eight D6−/− mice. Results are reported as mean ± SEM. (A, F, and K) CCL22. (B, G, and L) CCL2. (C, H, and M) CCL11. (D, I, and N) CCL3. (E, J, and O) CXCL2.
Article Snippet: To block inflammatory chemokines, animals were treated with a mixture of goat antibodies to the mouse CC chemokines CCL3L1 (catalog no. AB450NA), CCL4 (catalog no. AB451NA),
Techniques: Injection, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Combined Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and CC Chemokine Ligand 2 on Angiogenic Events in Endothelial Cells
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121249
Figure Lengend Snippet: tEnd.1 cells were treated with IGF-1 (A) or CCL2 (B) at concentrations of 5, 10, 50, or 100 ng/mL, and cell viability was determined by cell counting using a hemocytometer or MTT assay, respectively. (C) Flow cytometry results are presented as histograms of the average percentage of cells that expressed IGF-1R and CCR2 receptors (gray) and immunoglobulin control. Values and bars are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4/group). Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. Significant values compared to the control group: p < 0.05 (*) or p < 0.0001(***); significant value compared to control group and the other treatments: p < 0.0001 (#).
Article Snippet: Cells were then treated with
Techniques: Cell Counting, MTT Assay, Flow Cytometry, Control
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Combined Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and CC Chemokine Ligand 2 on Angiogenic Events in Endothelial Cells
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121249
Figure Lengend Snippet: tEnd.1 cells were treated with IGF-1 (100 ng/mL), CCL2 (10 ng/mL), or a combination of both for 24 h and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. ( A ) Photomicrographs show the expression of FN ascertained by immunofluorescence and fluorescence microscopy analysis. Magnification: 400× ( B ) Bars correspond to the quantitative analysis of FN expression in tEnd.1 cells in selected microscopic fields (n = 5/group). The results are expressed in pixels/μm 2 . ( C ) Flow cytometry results are presented as histograms of the average percentage of cells that expressed CD49e/VLA-5 and CD44 receptors for FN (gray) and immunoglobulin control. Values and bars are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5/group). Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. Significant values compared to control group: p < 0.0001 (***); significant values compared to control group and single treatments: p < 0.0001 (#).
Article Snippet: Cells were then treated with
Techniques: Fluorescence, Microscopy, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Flow Cytometry, Control
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Combined Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and CC Chemokine Ligand 2 on Angiogenic Events in Endothelial Cells
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121249
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) tEnd.1 cells treated with IGF-1 (100 ng/mL), CCL2 (10 ng/mL), or a combination of both for 24 h on BSA or FN coating were stained with Alexa 488-phalloidin and analyzed by confocal microscopy with a 63× objective. ( B ) tEnd.1 cells were allowed to adhere on BSA- or FN-coated surfaces for 1 h after stimulation with IGF-1, CCL2, or IGF-1/CCL2 for 24 h. ( C ) tEnd.1 cells were allowed to migrate through transwell chambers coated with BSA or FN after chemotactic stimulation with IGF-1, CCL2, or IGF-1/CCL2 for 6 h. Photomicrographs demonstrate cells invading through the transwell membrane. Giemsa staining. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( D ) Bars represent the number of migrating cells in a transwell system. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 5/group). Results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. Significant values compared to control group: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), or p < 0.0001 (***); significant values compared to control group and the IGF-1 treatment: p < 0.05 (#); and significant values compared to control group and single treatments: p < 0.01 (+).
Article Snippet: Cells were then treated with
Techniques: Staining, Confocal Microscopy, Membrane, Control
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Combined Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and CC Chemokine Ligand 2 on Angiogenic Events in Endothelial Cells
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121249
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) tEnd.1 cells were treated with IGF-1 (100 ng/mL), CCL2 (10 ng/mL), or a combination of both for 24 h and analyzed by optical microscopy. Photomicrographs show intracellular lumina in tEnd.1 cells, indicated by arrows. Giemsa staining. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( B ) tEnd.1 cells were treated with IGF-1, CCL2, or IGF-1/CCL2 for 8 days on BSA or FN coating and analyzed by optical microscopy. Photomicrographs demonstrate capillary-like structures, indicated by asterisks. Giemsa staining. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( C ) Number of capillary-like structures. ( D ) Luminal area of capillary-like structures. Bars represent the mean ± SEM (n = 6/group). Results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test. Significant compared with control, p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), or p < 0.001 (***).
Article Snippet: Cells were then treated with
Techniques: Microscopy, Staining, Control