mboi Search Results


97
New England Biolabs mboi restriction enzyme
Mboi Restriction Enzyme, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi restriction enzyme/product/New England Biolabs
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi restriction enzyme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Jena Bioscience mboi cut sites
Mboi Cut Sites, supplied by Jena Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi cut sites/product/Jena Bioscience
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi cut sites - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
New England Biolabs biotinylated primer
Biotinylated Primer, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated primer/product/New England Biolabs
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated primer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega mboi
Mboi, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega mboi restriction enzyme
Mboi Restriction Enzyme, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi restriction enzyme/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi restriction enzyme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
KOENEN GmbH restriction enzyme mboi
Restriction Enzyme Mboi, supplied by KOENEN GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/restriction enzyme mboi/product/KOENEN GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
restriction enzyme mboi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega restriction endonucleases cfoi, haeiii, mboi and mspi
Restriction Endonucleases Cfoi, Haeiii, Mboi And Mspi, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/restriction endonucleases cfoi, haeiii, mboi and mspi/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
restriction endonucleases cfoi, haeiii, mboi and mspi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega restriction enzymes mboi and drai
Restriction Enzymes Mboi And Drai, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/restriction enzymes mboi and drai/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
restriction enzymes mboi and drai - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biolog Inc mboi
Mboi, supplied by Biolog Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi/product/Biolog Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Rocha labs mboi pchic
Interaction range detection difference results in the low overlap between DpnII and HindIII. A Distance ranges of intra-chromosomal interaction In DpnII PCC vs. HindIII <t>PCHiC</t> (panels 1–3) and <t>MboI</t> PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panel 4) in monocyte (Mon), naive B cells (nB), naive CD4 T cells (nCD4) and cardiomyocytes (CM). The distance between mid-points of bait fragment and promoter-interacting region (PIR) was plotted in boxplot for significant cis-interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5). The upper whisker, upper hinge, middle line, middle dot, down hinge and down whisker indicate 95, 75%, median, mean, 25 and 5% percentile. B The number of significant cis-interaction across the different distance between bait and PIR. The significant cis-interactions in DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC were grouped based on the binned distance (250 k intervals) between mid-points of bait fragment and PIR. Interaction number within each group was plotted. The inset depicts comparative distance interaction distributions of MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC. C Venn diagram of genes annotated in DpnII PCC, MboI PCHiC, and HindIII PCHiC datasets. Genes were annotated when the bait of a significant interaction harbors its TSS. Regardless of PIR overlaps, shared (light green), DpnII-specific (dark green), MboI-specific (red), and HindIII-specific (blue) genes were determined based on whether corresponding baits have at least one significant distal interaction in both DpnII and HindIII, MboI and HindIII, or DpnII and MboI datasets. D Distance difference between interactions involving cutter-specific and shared genes. The interaction distance distribution measured by each method (x-axis) was calculated for cutter-specific gene sets (blue) or shared gene sets (red). The labeled p value was determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. E Example of SERBP1 interacting region range difference between DpnII PCC and HindIII PCHiC in naïve B cells. The DpnII and HindIII baits for SERBP1 were overlapped. Only significant interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5) were shown with arcs in either DpnII PCC (red) and HindIII PCHiC (blue)
Mboi Pchic, supplied by Rocha labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi pchic/product/Rocha labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi pchic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega restriction enzymes hinf i, taq i and mboi
Interaction range detection difference results in the low overlap between DpnII and HindIII. A Distance ranges of intra-chromosomal interaction In DpnII PCC vs. HindIII <t>PCHiC</t> (panels 1–3) and <t>MboI</t> PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panel 4) in monocyte (Mon), naive B cells (nB), naive CD4 T cells (nCD4) and cardiomyocytes (CM). The distance between mid-points of bait fragment and promoter-interacting region (PIR) was plotted in boxplot for significant cis-interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5). The upper whisker, upper hinge, middle line, middle dot, down hinge and down whisker indicate 95, 75%, median, mean, 25 and 5% percentile. B The number of significant cis-interaction across the different distance between bait and PIR. The significant cis-interactions in DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC were grouped based on the binned distance (250 k intervals) between mid-points of bait fragment and PIR. Interaction number within each group was plotted. The inset depicts comparative distance interaction distributions of MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC. C Venn diagram of genes annotated in DpnII PCC, MboI PCHiC, and HindIII PCHiC datasets. Genes were annotated when the bait of a significant interaction harbors its TSS. Regardless of PIR overlaps, shared (light green), DpnII-specific (dark green), MboI-specific (red), and HindIII-specific (blue) genes were determined based on whether corresponding baits have at least one significant distal interaction in both DpnII and HindIII, MboI and HindIII, or DpnII and MboI datasets. D Distance difference between interactions involving cutter-specific and shared genes. The interaction distance distribution measured by each method (x-axis) was calculated for cutter-specific gene sets (blue) or shared gene sets (red). The labeled p value was determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. E Example of SERBP1 interacting region range difference between DpnII PCC and HindIII PCHiC in naïve B cells. The DpnII and HindIII baits for SERBP1 were overlapped. Only significant interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5) were shown with arcs in either DpnII PCC (red) and HindIII PCHiC (blue)
Restriction Enzymes Hinf I, Taq I And Mboi, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/restriction enzymes hinf i, taq i and mboi/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
restriction enzymes hinf i, taq i and mboi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Dovetail Genomics mboi restriction enzyme
Interaction range detection difference results in the low overlap between DpnII and HindIII. A Distance ranges of intra-chromosomal interaction In DpnII PCC vs. HindIII <t>PCHiC</t> (panels 1–3) and <t>MboI</t> PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panel 4) in monocyte (Mon), naive B cells (nB), naive CD4 T cells (nCD4) and cardiomyocytes (CM). The distance between mid-points of bait fragment and promoter-interacting region (PIR) was plotted in boxplot for significant cis-interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5). The upper whisker, upper hinge, middle line, middle dot, down hinge and down whisker indicate 95, 75%, median, mean, 25 and 5% percentile. B The number of significant cis-interaction across the different distance between bait and PIR. The significant cis-interactions in DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC were grouped based on the binned distance (250 k intervals) between mid-points of bait fragment and PIR. Interaction number within each group was plotted. The inset depicts comparative distance interaction distributions of MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC. C Venn diagram of genes annotated in DpnII PCC, MboI PCHiC, and HindIII PCHiC datasets. Genes were annotated when the bait of a significant interaction harbors its TSS. Regardless of PIR overlaps, shared (light green), DpnII-specific (dark green), MboI-specific (red), and HindIII-specific (blue) genes were determined based on whether corresponding baits have at least one significant distal interaction in both DpnII and HindIII, MboI and HindIII, or DpnII and MboI datasets. D Distance difference between interactions involving cutter-specific and shared genes. The interaction distance distribution measured by each method (x-axis) was calculated for cutter-specific gene sets (blue) or shared gene sets (red). The labeled p value was determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. E Example of SERBP1 interacting region range difference between DpnII PCC and HindIII PCHiC in naïve B cells. The DpnII and HindIII baits for SERBP1 were overlapped. Only significant interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5) were shown with arcs in either DpnII PCC (red) and HindIII PCHiC (blue)
Mboi Restriction Enzyme, supplied by Dovetail Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mboi restriction enzyme/product/Dovetail Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mboi restriction enzyme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Interaction range detection difference results in the low overlap between DpnII and HindIII. A Distance ranges of intra-chromosomal interaction In DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panels 1–3) and MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panel 4) in monocyte (Mon), naive B cells (nB), naive CD4 T cells (nCD4) and cardiomyocytes (CM). The distance between mid-points of bait fragment and promoter-interacting region (PIR) was plotted in boxplot for significant cis-interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5). The upper whisker, upper hinge, middle line, middle dot, down hinge and down whisker indicate 95, 75%, median, mean, 25 and 5% percentile. B The number of significant cis-interaction across the different distance between bait and PIR. The significant cis-interactions in DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC were grouped based on the binned distance (250 k intervals) between mid-points of bait fragment and PIR. Interaction number within each group was plotted. The inset depicts comparative distance interaction distributions of MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC. C Venn diagram of genes annotated in DpnII PCC, MboI PCHiC, and HindIII PCHiC datasets. Genes were annotated when the bait of a significant interaction harbors its TSS. Regardless of PIR overlaps, shared (light green), DpnII-specific (dark green), MboI-specific (red), and HindIII-specific (blue) genes were determined based on whether corresponding baits have at least one significant distal interaction in both DpnII and HindIII, MboI and HindIII, or DpnII and MboI datasets. D Distance difference between interactions involving cutter-specific and shared genes. The interaction distance distribution measured by each method (x-axis) was calculated for cutter-specific gene sets (blue) or shared gene sets (red). The labeled p value was determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. E Example of SERBP1 interacting region range difference between DpnII PCC and HindIII PCHiC in naïve B cells. The DpnII and HindIII baits for SERBP1 were overlapped. Only significant interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5) were shown with arcs in either DpnII PCC (red) and HindIII PCHiC (blue)

Journal: Human genetics

Article Title: Restriction enzyme selection dictates detection range sensitivity in chromatin conformation capture-based variant-to-gene mapping approaches

doi: 10.1007/s00439-021-02326-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Interaction range detection difference results in the low overlap between DpnII and HindIII. A Distance ranges of intra-chromosomal interaction In DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panels 1–3) and MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC (panel 4) in monocyte (Mon), naive B cells (nB), naive CD4 T cells (nCD4) and cardiomyocytes (CM). The distance between mid-points of bait fragment and promoter-interacting region (PIR) was plotted in boxplot for significant cis-interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5). The upper whisker, upper hinge, middle line, middle dot, down hinge and down whisker indicate 95, 75%, median, mean, 25 and 5% percentile. B The number of significant cis-interaction across the different distance between bait and PIR. The significant cis-interactions in DpnII PCC vs. HindIII PCHiC were grouped based on the binned distance (250 k intervals) between mid-points of bait fragment and PIR. Interaction number within each group was plotted. The inset depicts comparative distance interaction distributions of MboI PCHiC vs. HindIII PCHiC. C Venn diagram of genes annotated in DpnII PCC, MboI PCHiC, and HindIII PCHiC datasets. Genes were annotated when the bait of a significant interaction harbors its TSS. Regardless of PIR overlaps, shared (light green), DpnII-specific (dark green), MboI-specific (red), and HindIII-specific (blue) genes were determined based on whether corresponding baits have at least one significant distal interaction in both DpnII and HindIII, MboI and HindIII, or DpnII and MboI datasets. D Distance difference between interactions involving cutter-specific and shared genes. The interaction distance distribution measured by each method (x-axis) was calculated for cutter-specific gene sets (blue) or shared gene sets (red). The labeled p value was determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. E Example of SERBP1 interacting region range difference between DpnII PCC and HindIII PCHiC in naïve B cells. The DpnII and HindIII baits for SERBP1 were overlapped. Only significant interactions (CHiCAGO score > 5) were shown with arcs in either DpnII PCC (red) and HindIII PCHiC (blue)

Article Snippet: The detection ranges of MboI PCHiC, DpnII PCC and HindIII PCHiC are all consistent with the size of mammalian topologically associating domains (TADs), which range from 100 to 5 Mb with an average of ~ 1Mb ( Rocha et al. 2015 ).

Techniques: Whisker Assay, Labeling, Two Tailed Test