Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Implementation of Tomo EDGE in the independent dose calculator CheckTomo

doi: 10.1002/acm2.12048

Figure Lengend Snippet: Dose profiles of the plans calculated in the TomoPhant for varying PTV length, for the 2.5 cm field width (a) and 5 cm (b). Plain line corresponds to the dose calculated by the tomotherapy TPS and dots to CheckTomo dose points.

Article Snippet: For each case, the mean dose difference ( Δ D ̄ ) and global gamma comparison tests between the CheckTomo and the tomotherapy TPS dose distributions were calculated.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Implementation of Tomo EDGE in the independent dose calculator CheckTomo

doi: 10.1002/acm2.12048

Figure Lengend Snippet: Coronal view of the relative difference, given in percent, between the CheckTomo and the tomotherapy TPS dose of a pelvis plan. As one can see in figure (a), the dose is miscalculated in both edges of the target volume. The error is corrected by applying a 1 mm shift in the longitudinal direction ( IEC ‐y) to the TPS dose distribution, as shown in figure (b).

Article Snippet: For each case, the mean dose difference ( Δ D ̄ ) and global gamma comparison tests between the CheckTomo and the tomotherapy TPS dose distributions were calculated.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Comparison of the KonRad IMRT and XiO treatment planning systems

doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2770

Figure Lengend Snippet: Dose verification of the AP field for the prostate case. The left panel shows the dose distribution (isodose lines) calculated by the KonRad TPS together with the ones measured with the MapCheck device. The right panel shows the vertical profile of the dose distribution. The measured dose points are shown as yellow circles, the calculated dose profile as a solid line. For this field 202 out of 205 points passed the 3%/3mm acceptance criteria.

Article Snippet: The verification plans were generated and the beams from each plan were delivered individually on the MapCheck device using a Siemens Primus linear accelerator.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Article Title: Comparison of the KonRad IMRT and XiO treatment planning systems

doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2770

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of the dose verification of the twelve plans on the Sun Nuclear MapCheck device. The acceptance criteria demanded a dose difference less than 3% within 3 mm. With passing rates well above 90%, all plans were clinically acceptable.

Article Snippet: The verification plans were generated and the beams from each plan were delivered individually on the MapCheck device using a Siemens Primus linear accelerator.

Techniques:

Journal: Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

Article Title: Efficacy and clinical use of novel high-resolution EPID-based 2D and 3D automated patient-specific quality assurance for SRS and SBRT patients

doi: 10.1007/s00411-025-01182-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plots with difference between electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and SRS MapCHECK ® for gamma analysis criteria 2% (DD) and 1 mm (DTA). PDIP: portal dose image prediction, PF: PerFRACTION™, 2D: 2-dimensional, 3D: 3-dimensional, DD: Dose Difference, DTA: Distance to Agreement

Article Snippet: Patients were selected such that the maximum field size was less than 7.7 cm × 7.7 cm because of the field size limitation of the SRS MapCHECK ® (Sun Nuclear Corporation, USA).

Techniques: Imaging