fgf 4 protein Search Results


95
R&D Systems fgf4
Fgf4, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Human+FGF-4+Protein/pmc04086345-132-56-57
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fgf4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems recombinant mouse fgf4
Recombinant Mouse Fgf4, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Mouse+FGF-4+Protein/pm25533345-192-0-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse fgf4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Novus Biologicals fgf4
Fgf4, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Human+FGF-4+Protein/pmc09588010-346-67-69
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fgf4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems penicillinstreptomycin
Penicillinstreptomycin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Human+FGF-4+Protein%2C+CF/pm38907996-204-19-30
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
penicillinstreptomycin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech growth factor β tgf β recombinant protein 112
Growth Factor β Tgf β Recombinant Protein 112, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Animal-free+Recombinant+Human+FGF-4/10__1016_slash_j__jpha__2026__101610-84-2-11
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
growth factor β tgf β recombinant protein 112 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
R&D Systems f4 025 heparin sodium salt
F4 025 Heparin Sodium Salt, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Human+FGF-4+(aa+71-206)+Protein/pm38823394-227-63-61
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
f4 025 heparin sodium salt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc recombinant protein
Fig. 1. Induction of NCAM in peripheral blood monocyte (PBMo)-derived macrophages stimulated with conditioned medium of a TE series ESCC cell line (TECM). PBMos were treated with 25 ng/mL <t>recombinant</t> human M-CSF for 6 d to induce Macrophage_L and then exposed to the TECM (TE-8, TE-9 and TE-15) for 2 d to induce TAM_Ls. (A) NCAM mRNA induction in the TAM_Ls was confirmed by RT-PCR (left panel). The results were normalized to GAPDH as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (B) NCAM expression levels in the TAM_Ls were determined by quantitative RT-PCR, compared with those of the Macrophage_Ls, and normalized to GAPDH expression. The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (C) NCAM induction was also confirmed in the TAM_Ls by western blotting (left panel). The results were normalized to β-actin as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with the ImageJ (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (D) NCAM and CD11b expression in Macrophage_Ls and TAM_Ls. Double immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) plus the macrophage marker anti-CD11b (red). NCAM expression was detectable in TAM_Ls_TE-9 (left panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. NCAM fluorescent intensity data were quantified using ImageJ (right panel). The corrected total cell flu- orescence (CTCE) was calculated as integrated density −(area of selected cell × mean fluorescence of background reading). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, **p < 0.001). (E) The localization of NCAM and F-actin in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Nuclei and F-actin were stained with DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red), respectively. NCAM and F-actin were co-localized at a part of the lamellipodia (arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Recombinant Protein, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Human+FGF-4+Recombinant+Protein/pm27317650-57-5-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems recombinant mouse fgf basic protein
Fig. 1. Induction of NCAM in peripheral blood monocyte (PBMo)-derived macrophages stimulated with conditioned medium of a TE series ESCC cell line (TECM). PBMos were treated with 25 ng/mL <t>recombinant</t> human M-CSF for 6 d to induce Macrophage_L and then exposed to the TECM (TE-8, TE-9 and TE-15) for 2 d to induce TAM_Ls. (A) NCAM mRNA induction in the TAM_Ls was confirmed by RT-PCR (left panel). The results were normalized to GAPDH as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (B) NCAM expression levels in the TAM_Ls were determined by quantitative RT-PCR, compared with those of the Macrophage_Ls, and normalized to GAPDH expression. The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (C) NCAM induction was also confirmed in the TAM_Ls by western blotting (left panel). The results were normalized to β-actin as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with the ImageJ (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (D) NCAM and CD11b expression in Macrophage_Ls and TAM_Ls. Double immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) plus the macrophage marker anti-CD11b (red). NCAM expression was detectable in TAM_Ls_TE-9 (left panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. NCAM fluorescent intensity data were quantified using ImageJ (right panel). The corrected total cell flu- orescence (CTCE) was calculated as integrated density −(area of selected cell × mean fluorescence of background reading). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, **p < 0.001). (E) The localization of NCAM and F-actin in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Nuclei and F-actin were stained with DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red), respectively. NCAM and F-actin were co-localized at a part of the lamellipodia (arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Recombinant Mouse Fgf Basic Protein, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Mouse+FGF-4+Protein%2C+CF/pmc05404880-196-12-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse fgf basic protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems 1 fgf4
Fig. 1. Induction of NCAM in peripheral blood monocyte (PBMo)-derived macrophages stimulated with conditioned medium of a TE series ESCC cell line (TECM). PBMos were treated with 25 ng/mL <t>recombinant</t> human M-CSF for 6 d to induce Macrophage_L and then exposed to the TECM (TE-8, TE-9 and TE-15) for 2 d to induce TAM_Ls. (A) NCAM mRNA induction in the TAM_Ls was confirmed by RT-PCR (left panel). The results were normalized to GAPDH as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (B) NCAM expression levels in the TAM_Ls were determined by quantitative RT-PCR, compared with those of the Macrophage_Ls, and normalized to GAPDH expression. The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (C) NCAM induction was also confirmed in the TAM_Ls by western blotting (left panel). The results were normalized to β-actin as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with the ImageJ (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (D) NCAM and CD11b expression in Macrophage_Ls and TAM_Ls. Double immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) plus the macrophage marker anti-CD11b (red). NCAM expression was detectable in TAM_Ls_TE-9 (left panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. NCAM fluorescent intensity data were quantified using ImageJ (right panel). The corrected total cell flu- orescence (CTCE) was calculated as integrated density −(area of selected cell × mean fluorescence of background reading). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, **p < 0.001). (E) The localization of NCAM and F-actin in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Nuclei and F-actin were stained with DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red), respectively. NCAM and F-actin were co-localized at a part of the lamellipodia (arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
1 Fgf4, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fgf+4+protein/Recombinant+Mouse+FGF-4+(aa+67-202)+Protein/bio_rxiv__2022__08__01__502375-126-36-38
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
1 fgf4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 1. Induction of NCAM in peripheral blood monocyte (PBMo)-derived macrophages stimulated with conditioned medium of a TE series ESCC cell line (TECM). PBMos were treated with 25 ng/mL recombinant human M-CSF for 6 d to induce Macrophage_L and then exposed to the TECM (TE-8, TE-9 and TE-15) for 2 d to induce TAM_Ls. (A) NCAM mRNA induction in the TAM_Ls was confirmed by RT-PCR (left panel). The results were normalized to GAPDH as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (B) NCAM expression levels in the TAM_Ls were determined by quantitative RT-PCR, compared with those of the Macrophage_Ls, and normalized to GAPDH expression. The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (C) NCAM induction was also confirmed in the TAM_Ls by western blotting (left panel). The results were normalized to β-actin as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with the ImageJ (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (D) NCAM and CD11b expression in Macrophage_Ls and TAM_Ls. Double immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) plus the macrophage marker anti-CD11b (red). NCAM expression was detectable in TAM_Ls_TE-9 (left panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. NCAM fluorescent intensity data were quantified using ImageJ (right panel). The corrected total cell flu- orescence (CTCE) was calculated as integrated density −(area of selected cell × mean fluorescence of background reading). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, **p < 0.001). (E) The localization of NCAM and F-actin in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Nuclei and F-actin were stained with DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red), respectively. NCAM and F-actin were co-localized at a part of the lamellipodia (arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Journal: Cancer letters

Article Title: NCAM- and FGF-2-mediated FGFR1 signaling in the tumor microenvironment of esophageal cancer regulates the survival and migration of tumor-associated macrophages and cancer cells.

doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.06.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Induction of NCAM in peripheral blood monocyte (PBMo)-derived macrophages stimulated with conditioned medium of a TE series ESCC cell line (TECM). PBMos were treated with 25 ng/mL recombinant human M-CSF for 6 d to induce Macrophage_L and then exposed to the TECM (TE-8, TE-9 and TE-15) for 2 d to induce TAM_Ls. (A) NCAM mRNA induction in the TAM_Ls was confirmed by RT-PCR (left panel). The results were normalized to GAPDH as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (B) NCAM expression levels in the TAM_Ls were determined by quantitative RT-PCR, compared with those of the Macrophage_Ls, and normalized to GAPDH expression. The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (C) NCAM induction was also confirmed in the TAM_Ls by western blotting (left panel). The results were normalized to β-actin as a control, and densitometric analysis of bands was performed with the ImageJ (right panel). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, *p < 0.05). (D) NCAM and CD11b expression in Macrophage_Ls and TAM_Ls. Double immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) plus the macrophage marker anti-CD11b (red). NCAM expression was detectable in TAM_Ls_TE-9 (left panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. NCAM fluorescent intensity data were quantified using ImageJ (right panel). The corrected total cell flu- orescence (CTCE) was calculated as integrated density −(area of selected cell × mean fluorescence of background reading). The results are the mean ± SEM (n = 3, **p < 0.001). (E) The localization of NCAM and F-actin in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Immunofluorescence was performed using anti-NCAM (green) in TAM_Ls_TE-9. Nuclei and F-actin were stained with DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red), respectively. NCAM and F-actin were co-localized at a part of the lamellipodia (arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Article Snippet: The following selective inhibitors and recombinant protein were used: PI3K inhibitor (LY294002, 20 μM; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA); FGFR1 inhibitor (SU5402, 50 μM; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); human recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (rhFGF-2, 5–20 ng/mL; R&D Systems).

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Recombinant, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Control, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Marker, Staining