ecg interpretation system Search Results


ecg interpretations  (Philips Healthcare)
86
Philips Healthcare ecg interpretations
Ecg Interpretations, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ecg interpretations/product/Philips Healthcare
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ecg interpretations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
universal 12-lead interpretive ecg system  (NuMED Inc)
90
NuMED Inc universal 12-lead interpretive ecg system
Universal 12 Lead Interpretive Ecg System, supplied by NuMED Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/universal 12-lead interpretive ecg system/product/NuMED Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
universal 12-lead interpretive ecg system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ecg interpretation line  (EPIC Systems Corporation)
90
EPIC Systems Corporation ecg interpretation line
Ecg Interpretation Line, supplied by EPIC Systems Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ecg interpretation line/product/EPIC Systems Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ecg interpretation line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
1l ecg automated algorithm interpretation  (AliveCor Inc)
90
AliveCor Inc 1l ecg automated algorithm interpretation
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
1l Ecg Automated Algorithm Interpretation, supplied by AliveCor Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/1l ecg automated algorithm interpretation/product/AliveCor Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
1l ecg automated algorithm interpretation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
hes pro ecg-interpretation software  (Biosigna Inc)
90
Biosigna Inc hes pro ecg-interpretation software
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Hes Pro Ecg Interpretation Software, supplied by Biosigna Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hes pro ecg-interpretation software/product/Biosigna Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hes pro ecg-interpretation software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ge/marquette ecg interpretative software on a zoll e series cardiac monitor/defibrillator  (ZOLL Medical)
90
ZOLL Medical ge/marquette ecg interpretative software on a zoll e series cardiac monitor/defibrillator
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Ge/Marquette Ecg Interpretative Software On A Zoll E Series Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillator, supplied by ZOLL Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ge/marquette ecg interpretative software on a zoll e series cardiac monitor/defibrillator/product/ZOLL Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ge/marquette ecg interpretative software on a zoll e series cardiac monitor/defibrillator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
automated ecg interpretation (zoll e-series ge/marquette algorithm  (ZOLL Medical)
90
ZOLL Medical automated ecg interpretation (zoll e-series ge/marquette algorithm
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Automated Ecg Interpretation (Zoll E Series Ge/Marquette Algorithm, supplied by ZOLL Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/automated ecg interpretation (zoll e-series ge/marquette algorithm/product/ZOLL Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
automated ecg interpretation (zoll e-series ge/marquette algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
12-lead ecg interpretation  (MidAtlantic Diagnostics Inc)
90
MidAtlantic Diagnostics Inc 12-lead ecg interpretation
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
12 Lead Ecg Interpretation, supplied by MidAtlantic Diagnostics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/12-lead ecg interpretation/product/MidAtlantic Diagnostics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
12-lead ecg interpretation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
siemens-elema version of the glasgow ecg interpretation program  (Siemens AG)
90
Siemens AG siemens-elema version of the glasgow ecg interpretation program
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Siemens Elema Version Of The Glasgow Ecg Interpretation Program, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/siemens-elema version of the glasgow ecg interpretation program/product/Siemens AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
siemens-elema version of the glasgow ecg interpretation program - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
crisp method of ecg interpretation  (AORN Inc)
90
AORN Inc crisp method of ecg interpretation
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Crisp Method Of Ecg Interpretation, supplied by AORN Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/crisp method of ecg interpretation/product/AORN Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
crisp method of ecg interpretation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
automated ecg interpretation software  (LAXTHA Inc)
90
LAXTHA Inc automated ecg interpretation software
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Automated Ecg Interpretation Software, supplied by LAXTHA Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/automated ecg interpretation software/product/LAXTHA Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
automated ecg interpretation software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ecg interpretation criteria handbook  (Siemens AG)
90
Siemens AG ecg interpretation criteria handbook
Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld <t>1L</t> <t>ECG</t> tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = <t>electrocardiogram.</t>
Ecg Interpretation Criteria Handbook, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ecg interpretation criteria handbook/product/Siemens AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ecg interpretation criteria handbook - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld 1L ECG tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = electrocardiogram.

Journal: JACC: Advances

Article Title: Performance of Single-Lead Handheld Electrocardiograms for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in Primary Care

doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100616

Figure Lengend Snippet: Study Overview and Predictive Values of AliveCor Algorithm Interpretations (A) An overview of the current study. A total of 38,190 handheld 1L ECG tracings were generated in the context of screening within the VITAL-AF trial. Of these, we excluded tracings performed among individuals with known AF at the time of screening, as well as those overread as uninterpretable by cardiologist readers, resulting in 31,376 tracings in the primary analysis (see text). We quantified the test characteristics of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm against cardiologist overread (primary analysis), against electrophysiologist overread (secondary analysis), and against clinical interpretation of a 12-lead ECG performed on the same day as screening (secondary analysis). (B) The positive predictive values (PPVs) (red) and negative predictive values (NPVs) (green) for the 4 AliveCor automated 1L ECG interpretations (x-axis), using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. Only PPV is depicted for possible AF , which always denotes a positive test, while only NPV is depicted for normal which always denotes a negative test. Since unclassified and no analysis represent equivocal findings, both PPV and NPV are shown. AF = atrial fibrillation; ECG = electrocardiogram.

Article Snippet: To quantify the performance of the 1L ECG automated algorithm interpretation for detecting AF, we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for each AliveCor reading.

Techniques: Generated

Effect of Unclassified and No Analysis Tracings on 1L ECG Diagnostic Performance Stratified by Age of Screening Depicted are the test characteristics (sensitivity, top left; positive predictive value [PPV], top right; specificity, bottom left, negative predictive value [NPV], bottom right) of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. In each plot, the relevant metric is plotted across age group (X-axis), and stratified by whether equivocal tracings (ie, unclassified or no analysis ) are considered positive vs negative results. In each plot, the hashed horizontal line depicts the corresponding estimate in the overall sample. ECG = electrocardiogram.

Journal: JACC: Advances

Article Title: Performance of Single-Lead Handheld Electrocardiograms for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in Primary Care

doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100616

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of Unclassified and No Analysis Tracings on 1L ECG Diagnostic Performance Stratified by Age of Screening Depicted are the test characteristics (sensitivity, top left; positive predictive value [PPV], top right; specificity, bottom left, negative predictive value [NPV], bottom right) of the AliveCor 1L ECG algorithm using cardiologist overread as the gold standard. In each plot, the relevant metric is plotted across age group (X-axis), and stratified by whether equivocal tracings (ie, unclassified or no analysis ) are considered positive vs negative results. In each plot, the hashed horizontal line depicts the corresponding estimate in the overall sample. ECG = electrocardiogram.

Article Snippet: To quantify the performance of the 1L ECG automated algorithm interpretation for detecting AF, we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for each AliveCor reading.

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay