coder Search Results


94
MathWorks Inc matlab embedded coder
Matlab Embedded Coder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab embedded coder/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab embedded coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MathWorks Inc matlab coder version 5 6
Matlab Coder Version 5 6, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab coder version 5 6/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab coder version 5 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MathWorks Inc simulink hdl coder
Simulink Hdl Coder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/simulink hdl coder/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulink hdl coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MathWorks Inc simulink coder
Simulink Coder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/simulink coder/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulink coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MathWorks Inc simulink model
Simulink Model, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/simulink model/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulink model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MathWorks Inc gpu coder
Gpu Coder, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gpu coder/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gpu coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
MathWorks Inc filter design hdl coder toolbox
Filter Design Hdl Coder Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/filter design hdl coder toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
filter design hdl coder toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DuPont de Nemours coder 300 automated synthesizer
Coder 300 Automated Synthesizer, supplied by DuPont de Nemours, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coder 300 automated synthesizer/product/DuPont de Nemours
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coder 300 automated synthesizer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BioInvent n-coder scfv
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
N Coder Scfv, supplied by BioInvent, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/n-coder scfv/product/BioInvent
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
n-coder scfv - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Grafix Inc fixations coder software
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Fixations Coder Software, supplied by Grafix Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fixations coder software/product/Grafix Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fixations coder software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Mitsubishi Tanabe multimode transform predictive coder
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Multimode Transform Predictive Coder, supplied by Mitsubishi Tanabe, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multimode transform predictive coder/product/Mitsubishi Tanabe
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multimode transform predictive coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sumika Chemical Analysis Service chn coder
( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an <t>scFv</t> library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.
Chn Coder, supplied by Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chn coder/product/Sumika Chemical Analysis Service
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chn coder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an scFv library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.

Journal: JCI Insight

Article Title: LILRB3 (ILT5) is a myeloid cell checkpoint that elicits profound immunomodulation

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.141593

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of antibody generation by phage-display via 3 independent “panning” techniques; (i) immobilized target (LILRB3), (ii) biotinylated target and excess nontarget (LILRB1), and (iii) LILRB3-transfected cell lines (from left to right). Biopanning was performed against generated target protein using an scFv library; “nontarget” cross-reactive scFv clones were removed by competition, and target-specific scFv clones were then eluted and converted to a soluble format, sequenced, and screened by various cell- and protein-based assays. ( B and C ) Screening of generated LILRB3 clones. ( B ) FMAT and ( C ) ELISA were performed and scFv clones screened against LILRB3 target– and LILRB1/LILRB2 nontarget–transfected CHO-S cells and extracellular LILRB1 protein, respectively. The relative binding to each target was calculated, with target-specific scFv clones depicted in yellow and the irrelevant isotype control shown in green. Nonbinding and cross-reactive scFv clones depicted in blue. ( D ) Screening of LILRB3 scFv clones by high-throughput flow cytometry. PBMCs (left plot) or LILR-transfected CHO-S (middle plot) cells were incubated with His-tagged scFv supernatants, followed by secondary anti-His staining. Where transfected CHO-S cells were used, LILRB1- and LILRB2-transfected cells were used as nontargets for LILRB3. Clones were compared against both gated CD14 + monocytes and target-transfected CHO-S cells (right plot). LILRB3-specific clones highlighted in yellow, nonspecific or nonbinding clones in red, and isotype control in green. ( E ) Specificity of LILRB3 clones against human LILR-transfected 2B4 cells. LILRB3 mAbs were tested against cells stably transfected with the indicated LILR family members by flow cytometry; a representative specific clone (A16; top panel) and a nonspecific cross-reactive clone (A30; bottom panel) are shown. ( F – G ) Testing the specificity of directly fluorochrome-labeled LILRB3 clones against primary cells by flow cytometry. ( F ) Fresh whole peripheral blood stained with either APC-labeled LILRB3 (represented by clone A16) or an irrelevant human (h) IgG1 isotype control as well as various leukocyte surface markers, as indicated. Dot plots and histograms are representative of multiple donors indicating gating of each leukocyte subset as indicated: T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, and granulocytes. ( G ) Graph showing relative expression of LILRB3 on each leukocyte subset. One-way ANOVA test performed (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005); n = 5 independent donors (each color represents an individual donor). ( E – F ) Histogram pink and blue traces indicate staining with irrelevant isotype control or LILRB3 mAb, respectively.

Article Snippet: In panning 1, BioInvent n-CoDeR scFv were selected using biotinylated in-house–produced recombinant LILRB3-hFc fusion proteins (captured with streptavidin-coated Dynabeads, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with or without competition or LILRB1-hFc coated onto etched polystyrene balls (Polysciences) or plastic immunotubes.

Techniques: Transfection, Generated, Clone Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Binding Assay, Control, High Throughput Screening Assay, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Staining, Stable Transfection, Labeling, Expressing