cetuximab Search Results


95
MedChemExpress cetuximab
Combinative treatment of β-elemene and <t>cetuximab</t> was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.
Cetuximab, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Cetuximab/pmc07163451-25-0-5
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetuximab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
R&D Systems antibody anti cetuximab
Combinative treatment of β-elemene and <t>cetuximab</t> was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.
Antibody Anti Cetuximab, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Cetuximab+Antibody+(2259C)+%5BAllophycocyanin%2FCy7%5D/pm38673914-289-16-18
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody anti cetuximab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Selleck Chemicals cetuximab
Combinative treatment of β-elemene and <t>cetuximab</t> was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.
Cetuximab, supplied by Selleck Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Cetuximab/pm38326078-196-10-13
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetuximab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems anti egfr antibody
Combinative treatment of β-elemene and <t>cetuximab</t> was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.
Anti Egfr Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Human+EGFR+(Research+Grade+Cetuximab+Biosimilar)+Alexa+Fluor%C2%AE+488-conjugated+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2023__09__28__559936-147-22-24
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti egfr antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals rabbit antihuman egfr
Combinative treatment of β-elemene and <t>cetuximab</t> was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.
Rabbit Antihuman Egfr, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/EGFR+Antibody+(C225+(Cetuximab))+%5BPE%5D+-+Chimeric/pm37041154-466-33-43
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit antihuman egfr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
R&D Systems cetuximab biosimilar
( A ) Left: Schematic of TRAC (top) and TET2 (bottom) loci alongside rAAV6 KI vectors. Right: Sanger sequencing electropherogram confirming integration of TRAC and TET2 KI constructs, underlined with dashed line. ( B ) Example plots of TET2 and TRAC-CAR19 single KI or dual TET2-TRAC-CAR19 KI T cells. ( C ) Example plots of CD3 loss detected by flow in TRAC-CAR19-KI T cells. ( D and E ) Schematic of in vitro ADCC assay (D) to deplete CRISPR-edited TET2-KI T cells. Example plots and data (E) of EGFR expression on TET2-KI T cells alone or in an NK cell coculture ± <t>cetuximab</t> incubation, gated on CD56 − populations, n = 4. ( F ) Cumulative fold expansion of TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells during restimulation and at day 25, arrows represent addition of irradiated K562-CD19 + target cells, n = 5. ( G ) Proportions of CD4 + versus CD8 + T cells in TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after stimulation, n = 7. ( H ) Example plots showing distribution of central (CCR7 + CD45RO + ) and effector (CCR7 − CD45RO + ) memory-associated markers in CD8 + CAR T cell populations after restimulation, with summary after five stimulations, n = 5. ( I ) SPICE plot showing distribution of IR coexpression in CD8 + TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after 1 (acute) and 5 (chronic) stimulations, n = 6. ( J ) Data shown as means ± SEM [(F) and (G)] or individual values [(E) and (H)] from independent donors. ns P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 by paired t test. Schematics [(A and (D)] created with BioRender.com .
Cetuximab Biosimilar, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Human+EGFR+(Research+Grade+Cetuximab+Biosimilar)+Antibody/pmc11559603-408-11-13
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetuximab biosimilar - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad anti cetuximab
( A ) Left: Schematic of TRAC (top) and TET2 (bottom) loci alongside rAAV6 KI vectors. Right: Sanger sequencing electropherogram confirming integration of TRAC and TET2 KI constructs, underlined with dashed line. ( B ) Example plots of TET2 and TRAC-CAR19 single KI or dual TET2-TRAC-CAR19 KI T cells. ( C ) Example plots of CD3 loss detected by flow in TRAC-CAR19-KI T cells. ( D and E ) Schematic of in vitro ADCC assay (D) to deplete CRISPR-edited TET2-KI T cells. Example plots and data (E) of EGFR expression on TET2-KI T cells alone or in an NK cell coculture ± <t>cetuximab</t> incubation, gated on CD56 − populations, n = 4. ( F ) Cumulative fold expansion of TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells during restimulation and at day 25, arrows represent addition of irradiated K562-CD19 + target cells, n = 5. ( G ) Proportions of CD4 + versus CD8 + T cells in TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after stimulation, n = 7. ( H ) Example plots showing distribution of central (CCR7 + CD45RO + ) and effector (CCR7 − CD45RO + ) memory-associated markers in CD8 + CAR T cell populations after restimulation, with summary after five stimulations, n = 5. ( I ) SPICE plot showing distribution of IR coexpression in CD8 + TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after 1 (acute) and 5 (chronic) stimulations, n = 6. ( J ) Data shown as means ± SEM [(F) and (G)] or individual values [(E) and (H)] from independent donors. ns P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 by paired t test. Schematics [(A and (D)] created with BioRender.com .
Anti Cetuximab, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Human+anti+Cetuximab/bio_rxiv__2020__10__31__363044-179-0-10
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cetuximab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals cetuximab
(A) Cell viability assays in EPC1-C, -P, -E, and -PE cells show that EPC1-PE cells are resistant to EGFR therapy-induced death, (n = 8). (B) Cell viability assays show that EPC2-PE cells are resistant to cell death, (n = 4). Vehicle control was DMSO. * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for <t>cetuximab</t> treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.
Cetuximab, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/EGFR+Antibody+(C225+(Cetuximab))+-+Azide+and+BSA+Free/pmc07592761-51-27-29
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetuximab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems anti cetuximab af647 idiotype
(A) Cell viability assays in EPC1-C, -P, -E, and -PE cells show that EPC1-PE cells are resistant to EGFR therapy-induced death, (n = 8). (B) Cell viability assays show that EPC2-PE cells are resistant to cell death, (n = 4). Vehicle control was DMSO. * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for <t>cetuximab</t> treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.
Anti Cetuximab Af647 Idiotype, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Anti-+Cetuximab+(Anti-Idiotype)+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2023__08__03__551705-121-11-15
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cetuximab af647 idiotype - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems cells with anti egfr af488
(A) Cell viability assays in EPC1-C, -P, -E, and -PE cells show that EPC1-PE cells are resistant to EGFR therapy-induced death, (n = 8). (B) Cell viability assays show that EPC2-PE cells are resistant to cell death, (n = 4). Vehicle control was DMSO. * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for <t>cetuximab</t> treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.
Cells With Anti Egfr Af488, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Human+EGFR+(Research+Grade+Cetuximab+Biosimilar)+Alexa+Fluor%C2%AE+488-conjugated+Antibody/pmc12804178-97-4-7
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cells with anti egfr af488 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems cetuximab
(A) Cell viability assays in EPC1-C, -P, -E, and -PE cells show that EPC1-PE cells are resistant to EGFR therapy-induced death, (n = 8). (B) Cell viability assays show that EPC2-PE cells are resistant to cell death, (n = 4). Vehicle control was DMSO. * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for <t>cetuximab</t> treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.
Cetuximab, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Human+EGFR+(Research+Grade+Cetuximab+Biosimilar)+Antibody/pm31497931-128-56-61
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetuximab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems biotinylated antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor
(A) Genes were all highly expressed in two cancer cell lines and barely expressed in BM samples. Specifically, there were no detectable levels of EGFR and EpCAM in both BM samples. MDA: MDA-MB-231; MCF7: MCF-7; BM1, BM2: bone marrow cells from healthy donors #1 and #2; BM1+1, +5, +50: 1, 5, 50 MDA-MB-231 cells were spiked into 1 million BM cells from healthy donor #1. (B) EGFR was highly expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, an observation that aligned with the literature. Nucleated human BM cells were used as control. Streptavidin-PE was used to label <t>biotinylated</t> antibodies.
Biotinylated Antibody Against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cetuximab/Human+EGFR+(Research+Grade+Cetuximab+Biosimilar)+Biotinylated+Antibody/pmc11902295-26-13-25
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation

doi: 10.7150/thno.44705

Figure Lengend Snippet: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab was sensitive to KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The sensitivity of KRAS mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer cells to cetuximab treatment (25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected by CCK-8 assay. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) The inhibitory effects and cytotoxicity of co-treatment with β-elemene (125 µg/ml) and cetuximab (25 µg/ml) in KRAS mutant CRC cells was determined after the treatment for 24 h. (C) Representative cell morphological changes are detected by light microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (E) Representative results of cell cycle and quantitative analysis after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (F) The colony-formation assay was performed and colony numbers are shown (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: Cetuximab (#33657) was purchased from MCE.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, CCK-8 Assay, Light Microscopy, Staining, Colony Assay

The effect of co-treatment with β-elemene and cetuximab on several ferroptotic events in KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The effect of cetuximab and β-elemene in combination with other cell death inhibitors on the cell viability of KRAS mutant HCT116 and Lovo cells after the treatment for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. (B) The cellular ROS level after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h was analyzed by a flow cytometer, ** P < 0.01. (C) Intracellular GSH level in KRAS mutant HCT116 and Lovo cells after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected, ** P < 0.01. (D) Intracellular MDA levels in KRAS mutant HCT116 and Lovo cells after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected, ** P < 0.01.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation

doi: 10.7150/thno.44705

Figure Lengend Snippet: The effect of co-treatment with β-elemene and cetuximab on several ferroptotic events in KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The effect of cetuximab and β-elemene in combination with other cell death inhibitors on the cell viability of KRAS mutant HCT116 and Lovo cells after the treatment for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. (B) The cellular ROS level after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h was analyzed by a flow cytometer, ** P < 0.01. (C) Intracellular GSH level in KRAS mutant HCT116 and Lovo cells after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected, ** P < 0.01. (D) Intracellular MDA levels in KRAS mutant HCT116 and Lovo cells after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h was detected, ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: Cetuximab (#33657) was purchased from MCE.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry

The iron ion level and mitochondria staining were detected. (A) The chelatable iron was determined using the fluorescent indicator Phen Green SK (green) after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. Scale bar = 100 µm. (B) The Mitochondria morphology was assessed with Mito-Tracker Green after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation

doi: 10.7150/thno.44705

Figure Lengend Snippet: The iron ion level and mitochondria staining were detected. (A) The chelatable iron was determined using the fluorescent indicator Phen Green SK (green) after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. Scale bar = 100 µm. (B) The Mitochondria morphology was assessed with Mito-Tracker Green after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Article Snippet: Cetuximab (#33657) was purchased from MCE.

Techniques: Staining

The effect of co-treatment with β-elemene and cetuximab on ferroptosis-related proteins in KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The expression of positive regulatory proteins for ferroptosis (HO-1 and transferrin) and the negative regulatory proteins for ferroptosis (GPX4, SLC7A11, FTH1, glutaminase, and SLC40A1) were detected by western blotting after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (B) HCT116 and Lovo cells were treated with cetuximab (25 µg/ml) and β-elemene (125 µg/ml) with or without ferroptosis inhibitors for 24 h and cell viability was assayed. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation

doi: 10.7150/thno.44705

Figure Lengend Snippet: The effect of co-treatment with β-elemene and cetuximab on ferroptosis-related proteins in KRAS mutant CRC cells. (A) The expression of positive regulatory proteins for ferroptosis (HO-1 and transferrin) and the negative regulatory proteins for ferroptosis (GPX4, SLC7A11, FTH1, glutaminase, and SLC40A1) were detected by western blotting after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h. (B) HCT116 and Lovo cells were treated with cetuximab (25 µg/ml) and β-elemene (125 µg/ml) with or without ferroptosis inhibitors for 24 h and cell viability was assayed. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: Cetuximab (#33657) was purchased from MCE.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Expressing, Western Blot

Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab suppressed the migration of KRAS mutant CRC cells by inhibiting EMT. (A) Representative results of wound healing after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml, DFO 20 nM) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) Transwell invasion assay was performed by the 24-transwell system and quantitative analysis. The pictures were taken 24 h after seeding (original magnification: × 100). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (C) The expression of several key EMT markers Vimentin, E-Cadherin, N-Cadherin, Slug, Snail and MMP-9 were detected after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h by western blotting.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation

doi: 10.7150/thno.44705

Figure Lengend Snippet: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab suppressed the migration of KRAS mutant CRC cells by inhibiting EMT. (A) Representative results of wound healing after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml, DFO 20 nM) for 24 h. The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (B) Transwell invasion assay was performed by the 24-transwell system and quantitative analysis. The pictures were taken 24 h after seeding (original magnification: × 100). The mean ± s.d. is shown. ** P < 0.01. (C) The expression of several key EMT markers Vimentin, E-Cadherin, N-Cadherin, Slug, Snail and MMP-9 were detected after the treatment (β-elemene 125 µg/ml, cetuximab 25 µg/ml) for 24 h by western blotting.

Article Snippet: Cetuximab (#33657) was purchased from MCE.

Techniques: Migration, Mutagenesis, Transwell Invasion Assay, Expressing, Western Blot

The antitumor efficacy of co-treatment with β-elemene and cetuximab in vivo . (A) The scheme of tumor inoculation and systemic injection. (B) Bioluminescent imaging for HCT116-luc orthotopic xenograft colon tumors at different time points post treatment (β-elemene 50 mg/kg, cetuximab 50 mg/kg) and representative image of metastatic lymph nodes. (C) Fold change in average radiance per mouse at experimental endpoint (day 18) was analyzed for each treatment group. Data are expressed as the mean ± s.d. (D) The survival curves of mice in each group were assessed.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation

doi: 10.7150/thno.44705

Figure Lengend Snippet: The antitumor efficacy of co-treatment with β-elemene and cetuximab in vivo . (A) The scheme of tumor inoculation and systemic injection. (B) Bioluminescent imaging for HCT116-luc orthotopic xenograft colon tumors at different time points post treatment (β-elemene 50 mg/kg, cetuximab 50 mg/kg) and representative image of metastatic lymph nodes. (C) Fold change in average radiance per mouse at experimental endpoint (day 18) was analyzed for each treatment group. Data are expressed as the mean ± s.d. (D) The survival curves of mice in each group were assessed.

Article Snippet: Cetuximab (#33657) was purchased from MCE.

Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Imaging

( A ) Left: Schematic of TRAC (top) and TET2 (bottom) loci alongside rAAV6 KI vectors. Right: Sanger sequencing electropherogram confirming integration of TRAC and TET2 KI constructs, underlined with dashed line. ( B ) Example plots of TET2 and TRAC-CAR19 single KI or dual TET2-TRAC-CAR19 KI T cells. ( C ) Example plots of CD3 loss detected by flow in TRAC-CAR19-KI T cells. ( D and E ) Schematic of in vitro ADCC assay (D) to deplete CRISPR-edited TET2-KI T cells. Example plots and data (E) of EGFR expression on TET2-KI T cells alone or in an NK cell coculture ± cetuximab incubation, gated on CD56 − populations, n = 4. ( F ) Cumulative fold expansion of TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells during restimulation and at day 25, arrows represent addition of irradiated K562-CD19 + target cells, n = 5. ( G ) Proportions of CD4 + versus CD8 + T cells in TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after stimulation, n = 7. ( H ) Example plots showing distribution of central (CCR7 + CD45RO + ) and effector (CCR7 − CD45RO + ) memory-associated markers in CD8 + CAR T cell populations after restimulation, with summary after five stimulations, n = 5. ( I ) SPICE plot showing distribution of IR coexpression in CD8 + TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after 1 (acute) and 5 (chronic) stimulations, n = 6. ( J ) Data shown as means ± SEM [(F) and (G)] or individual values [(E) and (H)] from independent donors. ns P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 by paired t test. Schematics [(A and (D)] created with BioRender.com .

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: TET2 regulates early and late transitions in exhausted CD8 + T cell differentiation and limits CAR T cell function

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp9371

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Left: Schematic of TRAC (top) and TET2 (bottom) loci alongside rAAV6 KI vectors. Right: Sanger sequencing electropherogram confirming integration of TRAC and TET2 KI constructs, underlined with dashed line. ( B ) Example plots of TET2 and TRAC-CAR19 single KI or dual TET2-TRAC-CAR19 KI T cells. ( C ) Example plots of CD3 loss detected by flow in TRAC-CAR19-KI T cells. ( D and E ) Schematic of in vitro ADCC assay (D) to deplete CRISPR-edited TET2-KI T cells. Example plots and data (E) of EGFR expression on TET2-KI T cells alone or in an NK cell coculture ± cetuximab incubation, gated on CD56 − populations, n = 4. ( F ) Cumulative fold expansion of TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells during restimulation and at day 25, arrows represent addition of irradiated K562-CD19 + target cells, n = 5. ( G ) Proportions of CD4 + versus CD8 + T cells in TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after stimulation, n = 7. ( H ) Example plots showing distribution of central (CCR7 + CD45RO + ) and effector (CCR7 − CD45RO + ) memory-associated markers in CD8 + CAR T cell populations after restimulation, with summary after five stimulations, n = 5. ( I ) SPICE plot showing distribution of IR coexpression in CD8 + TRAC-CAR19 and TET2-TRAC-CAR19 T cells after 1 (acute) and 5 (chronic) stimulations, n = 6. ( J ) Data shown as means ± SEM [(F) and (G)] or individual values [(E) and (H)] from independent donors. ns P > 0.05; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 by paired t test. Schematics [(A and (D)] created with BioRender.com .

Article Snippet: The following day, TET2 KI T cells were incubated with a cetuximab biosimilar (R&D Systems, no. MAB9577) at a concentration of 2000 ng/ml for 20 min. T cells were then cocultured at a 1:10 ratio with NK cells, with T cell numbers normalized to EGFR + expression.

Techniques: Sequencing, Construct, In Vitro, ADCC Assay, CRISPR, Expressing, Incubation, Irradiation

(A) Cell viability assays in EPC1-C, -P, -E, and -PE cells show that EPC1-PE cells are resistant to EGFR therapy-induced death, (n = 8). (B) Cell viability assays show that EPC2-PE cells are resistant to cell death, (n = 4). Vehicle control was DMSO. * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for cetuximab treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Loss of p120ctn causes EGFR-targeted therapy resistance and failure

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241299

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Cell viability assays in EPC1-C, -P, -E, and -PE cells show that EPC1-PE cells are resistant to EGFR therapy-induced death, (n = 8). (B) Cell viability assays show that EPC2-PE cells are resistant to cell death, (n = 4). Vehicle control was DMSO. * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for cetuximab treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.

Article Snippet: For viability testing, cells were treated with 5 μM gefitinib (#076091; Matrix Scientific, Columbia, SC), 10 μM erlotinib (#10483; Cayman Chemical; Ann Arbor, MI), or 10 nM cetuximab (#NBP2-75903; Novus Biologicals; Centennial, CO), with or without BAY 11–7085 (#B3033; ApexBio Technology; Houston, TX) at 2 μM or 3.3 μM for 48 hours.

Techniques: Control

(A) A dose response curve for BAY 11–7085 using EPC1 cells demonstrates no significant cell death in any cell line at 2 uM. (B) Western blot analysis demonstrates a decrease in pNFkB expression when cells are treated with 2 uM BAY 11–7085. (C) Cell viability assays demonstrate that treatment of EPC1 cells with 2 uM BAY 11–7085 in combination with either gefitinib, erlotinib, or cetuximab results in a partial reduction in cell viability in EPC1-PE cells (n = 3). Vehicle refers to cells treated with 2 uM BAY 11–7085 and DMSO (as the EGFR diluent). * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for cetuximab treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Loss of p120ctn causes EGFR-targeted therapy resistance and failure

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241299

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) A dose response curve for BAY 11–7085 using EPC1 cells demonstrates no significant cell death in any cell line at 2 uM. (B) Western blot analysis demonstrates a decrease in pNFkB expression when cells are treated with 2 uM BAY 11–7085. (C) Cell viability assays demonstrate that treatment of EPC1 cells with 2 uM BAY 11–7085 in combination with either gefitinib, erlotinib, or cetuximab results in a partial reduction in cell viability in EPC1-PE cells (n = 3). Vehicle refers to cells treated with 2 uM BAY 11–7085 and DMSO (as the EGFR diluent). * denotes p<0.05 for gefitinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. # denotes p<0.05 for erlotinib treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E. ^ denotes p<0.05 for cetuximab treatment comparisons between EPC-E vs. EPC-C and EPC-PE vs. EPC-E.

Article Snippet: For viability testing, cells were treated with 5 μM gefitinib (#076091; Matrix Scientific, Columbia, SC), 10 μM erlotinib (#10483; Cayman Chemical; Ann Arbor, MI), or 10 nM cetuximab (#NBP2-75903; Novus Biologicals; Centennial, CO), with or without BAY 11–7085 (#B3033; ApexBio Technology; Houston, TX) at 2 μM or 3.3 μM for 48 hours.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing

(A) Genes were all highly expressed in two cancer cell lines and barely expressed in BM samples. Specifically, there were no detectable levels of EGFR and EpCAM in both BM samples. MDA: MDA-MB-231; MCF7: MCF-7; BM1, BM2: bone marrow cells from healthy donors #1 and #2; BM1+1, +5, +50: 1, 5, 50 MDA-MB-231 cells were spiked into 1 million BM cells from healthy donor #1. (B) EGFR was highly expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, an observation that aligned with the literature. Nucleated human BM cells were used as control. Streptavidin-PE was used to label biotinylated antibodies.

Journal: PLOS One

Article Title: Microfluidic isolation and release of live disseminated breast tumor cells in bone marrow

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319392

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Genes were all highly expressed in two cancer cell lines and barely expressed in BM samples. Specifically, there were no detectable levels of EGFR and EpCAM in both BM samples. MDA: MDA-MB-231; MCF7: MCF-7; BM1, BM2: bone marrow cells from healthy donors #1 and #2; BM1+1, +5, +50: 1, 5, 50 MDA-MB-231 cells were spiked into 1 million BM cells from healthy donor #1. (B) EGFR was highly expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, an observation that aligned with the literature. Nucleated human BM cells were used as control. Streptavidin-PE was used to label biotinylated antibodies.

Article Snippet: Biotinylated antibody against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (anti-EpCAM) (eBioscience, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and biotinylated antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR, Research Grade Cetuximab Biosimilar) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were used as the tumor cell capture agents immobilized on the surface of the microchannels.

Techniques: Control