Journal: Microbiology Spectrum

Article Title: Density Analysis of Enterovirus D68 Shows Viral Particles Can Associate with Exosomes

doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02452-21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immune recognition of various EV-D68 densities and characterization of membrane-associated virus. (A) The y axis represents average dilutions of anti-EV-D68 mouse serum required to neutralize virus, divided by the average TCID 50 for respective viral densities (ANOVA post hoc Student'’s t test, P = 0.42, P = 0.68, P = 0.70). (B) Three viral density isolates (1.11, 1.20, and 1.24 g/cm 3 ) were treated with 0.01 mg/mL 15C5-Chmra antibody for 1 h, then mix was put onto TCID 50 plates to assess the viral titer of each isolate. Gray highlight represents detection limit. Asterisks (*) indicate statistical significance (1.11 g/cm 3 , P = 0.0003; 1.20 g/cm 3 , P < 0.0001; 1.24 g/cm 3 , P = 0.0064), all versus respective control, determined by Dunnett’s Method. (C) 15C5-Chmra antibody bound to magnetic beads was added to membrane-associated and naked virus. After 1 h, a magnet was used to remove antibody and the supernatant was added to a TCID 50 plate to assess viral titer (15C5-Chmra versus control: *, P < 0.0005 for both membrane-associated and naked virus; Dunnett’s Method). (D) ICAM-5 or N -acetylneuraminic acid (sialic acid) were attached to magnetic beads and the antibody/bead complex was incubated with membrane-associated or naked virus samples for 1 h. Beads were rinsed twice in excess PBS and viral titer was assessed to determine how much virus was immunoprecipitated from the supernatant (control versus ICAM5 and control versus sialic acid for membrane-associated and naked virus; *, P = 0.0001 determined by Dunnett’s Method). (E) Exosome antibody array on 1.11 g/cm 3 fraction, examining cytosolic proteins (FLOT1, ALIX, TSG101), transmembrane proteins (CD63, CD81, ANXA5), and cis -golgi matrix protein as markers for cellular contamination (GM130). Example blot is shown on the right and chart represents average intensity across three biological replicates. Positive control indicates detection reagents are working correctly, and do not represent an exosome-specific control. Error bars represent standard deviation. Statistics: comparison with control (blank) using Dunnett’s Method ( P = 0.999 for GM130; *, P = 0.027 for FLOT1; P = 0.218 for ICAM; *, P = 0.005 for ALIX; P = 0.086 for CD81; *, P < 0.0001 for CD63; P = 0.305 for EpCAM; *, P < 0.0001 for ANXA5; *, P = 0.0008 for TSG101). Asterisks indicate statistical significance. (F) Anti-CD81 or anti-CD63 antibodies were attached to magnetic beads and incubated with membrane-associated virus. Supernatant was discarded, and beads were rinsed and treated with 0.01% NP-40 (to dissolve exosomes and release virus from bead) before TCID 50 measurement. CD81 versus control: *, P = 0.0178; CD63 versus control: *, P = 0.0180 as determined by Dunnett’s Method. Gray highlight represents detection limit. (G) RD or SH-SY5Y cells in TCID 50 plate were infected with MO47 with or without exosomes in the medium. The “A549 exosomes added” bar represents exosome-depleted media to which purified A549 exosomes were added. Gray panel represents TCID 50 plates containing SH-SY5Y cells. Each condition represents 3 biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation. ANOVA: *, P < 0.05. Green panel represents TCID 50 plates containing RD cells. Each condition represents 4 biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviation. ANOVA: *, P < 0.05.

Article Snippet: We followed the coupling protocol from the Dynabeads Antibody Coupling Kit (Thermo Fisher, cat no. 14311D) to covalently attach magnetic beads to the following antibodies: anti-CD81 (1D6) monoclonal antibody (Novus Biologicals NB100-65805), anti-CD63 (H5C6) monoclonal antibody (Novus Biologicals NBP2-42225), 15C5-chimeric monoclonal antibody (generous gift from Michael Pauly at ZabBio), and anti-HSV negative control (generous gift from Michael Pauly at ZabBio).

Techniques: Membrane, Virus, Control, Magnetic Beads, Incubation, Immunoprecipitation, Ab Array, Positive Control, Standard Deviation, Comparison, Infection, Purification

Journal: Cancer Medicine

Article Title: Exosome‐mediated delivery of miR‐204‐5p inhibits tumor growth and chemoresistance

doi: 10.1002/cam4.3248

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characteristics of exosomes derived from miR‐204‐5p‐overexpressing HEK293T cells. A, The markers of exosomes (CD63 and Flotillin‐2) were detected in HEK293T cells and exosomes by Western blot. B, The transmission electron micrograph showed roundshaped vesicles with bilayered membranes ranging from 100 nm to 150 nm in diameter released by HEK293T cells. Scale bar = 200 nm. C, 293T EXOs size distribution was measured by Zetasizer. D, Real‐time qRT‐PCR revealed that the level of miR‐204‐5p was higher in 293T‐204 cells and miR‐204 EXO than miR‐204‐3p. *** P < .001. Shown are mean ± SEM from three independent experiments

Article Snippet: The protein samples of cells and exosomes were detected with antibodies against CD63 (1:1000; BOSTER), Flotillin‐2 (1:500; Santa Cruz), RAB22A (1:1000; Proteintech), Bcl2 (1:1000; Santa Cruz) and β‐actin (1:2000; Thermo) as we previously described.,

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Western Blot, Transmission Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Bovine Milk-Derived Exosomes as a Drug Delivery Vehicle for miRNA-Based Therapy

doi: 10.3390/ijms22031105

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Western Blot analysis of proteins present (Hsp90, CD63 and TSG101) or absent (calnexin) in exosomes and abundant in bovine milk (β-casein). Protein evaluation in: bovine skimmed milk (SM); exosomes obtained from SM by one (1U) or two (2U) ultracentrifugation steps; and the cellular fraction (CF). Equal amount of protein was loaded. Elution protein profile (F.1, F.8 to F.40) of bovine exosomes isolated by 1U followed by SEC (1U + SEC) ( B ) or 2U + SEC ( C ). Protein concentration (mg/mL) was estimated by the BCA assay. WB of SEC elution fractions from exosomes isolated by 1U + SEC ( D ) or 2U + SEC ( E ). Evaluation of Hsp90, CD63, TSG101, Calnexin and β-casein levels in each fraction (F.1, F.8 to F.40). Mimic hsa-miRNA-148a-3p elution profile (relative expression) of exosomes isolated from skimmed milk by U + T + SEC ( F ) or U + T + U + SEC ( G ). Mw: Molecular weight marker (Bio-Rad).

Article Snippet: Membranes were then incubated with appropriate primary antibodies: anti-Hsp90 (610418, BD, Madrid, Spain), anti-CD63 (bs-1523R, BIOSS, Woburn, MA, USA), anti-TSG101 (A303-506A, Bethyl, Montgomery, TX, USA), anti-calnexin (A303-694A, Bethyl) or anti-β-casein (ab112595, abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4 °C (overnight).

Techniques: Western Blot, Isolation, Protein Concentration, BIA-KA, Expressing, Molecular Weight, Marker

Journal: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Article Title: Blockade of Exosome Release Suppresses Atrial Fibrillation by Alleviating Atrial Fibrosis in Canines With Prolonged Atrial Pacing

doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.699175

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characteristics of plasma exosomes in a canine model of AF. (A) Representative electron microscopy image of exosomes isolated from plasma ( n = 3, scale bar, 100 nm). (B) Representative NTA picture of the exosome size range and concentration ( n = 3; dilution ratio, 1:500). (C) The concentration of plasma exosomes according to NTA analysis and plasma volume. (D) Representative western blotting images of the exosome markers CD63, CD81, and TSG101. * P < 0.05 vs. the sham group. # P < 0.05 vs. the pacing group. AF, atrial fibrillation; NTA, nanoparticle tracking analysis.

Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD63 (Biorbyt, England), CD81 (Abcam, USA), TSG101 (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), Rab27a (Sanying Biotechnology, China), collagen I (Novusbio, USA), collagen III (Abcam, USA), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 (Bioss, USA), MMP-9 (Bioss, USA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3(TIMP3) (Lsbio, USA), and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) (Sanying Biotechnology, China).

Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Electron Microscopy, Isolation, Concentration Assay, Western Blot

Journal: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Article Title: Blockade of Exosome Release Suppresses Atrial Fibrillation by Alleviating Atrial Fibrosis in Canines With Prolonged Atrial Pacing

doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.699175

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of exosomal marker proteins in the atria from a canine AF model. (A,B) Immunohistochemistry staining of CD63 and mean values of CD63 intensity in the atria ( n = 6, ×200). (C) Representative western blotting images of Rab27a, CD63, CD81, and TSG101 in the atria ( n = 6 for the sham group and n = 7 for the pacing and GW4869 groups). (D–G) The mean expression levels of Rab27a, CD63, CD81, and TSG101 in the atria ( n = 6 for the sham group and n = 7 for the pacing and GW4869 groups). *** P < 0.001 vs. the sham group. ## P < 0.01 vs. the pacing group, ### P < 0.001 vs. the pacing group. ΔΔ P < 0.01, ΔΔΔ P < 0.001 vs. the sham group. AF, atrial fibrillation.

Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD63 (Biorbyt, England), CD81 (Abcam, USA), TSG101 (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), Rab27a (Sanying Biotechnology, China), collagen I (Novusbio, USA), collagen III (Abcam, USA), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 (Bioss, USA), MMP-9 (Bioss, USA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3(TIMP3) (Lsbio, USA), and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) (Sanying Biotechnology, China).

Techniques: Marker, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing