alternaria Search Results


t maritimum lgm 11612  (ATCC)
94
ATCC t maritimum lgm 11612
T Maritimum Lgm 11612, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pm37764049-263-43-61?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
t maritimum lgm 11612 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
atcc 11801  (ATCC)
94
ATCC atcc 11801
Atcc 11801, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pmc07644974-88-43-43?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
atcc 11801 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
a solani atcc 62102  (ATCC)
93
ATCC a solani atcc 62102
A Solani Atcc 62102, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/10__1016_slash_j__aoas__2021__01__006-93-21-23?v=ATCC
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
a solani atcc 62102 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gr gr gr 24463 s aureus  (ATCC)
93
ATCC gr gr gr 24463 s aureus
Gr Gr Gr 24463 S Aureus, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/us10959947-382-655-671?v=ATCC
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gr gr gr 24463 s aureus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
vx2 tumors  (ATCC)
93
ATCC vx2 tumors
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
Vx2 Tumors, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pmc07244229-63-5-11?v=ATCC
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vx2 tumors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fungus a brassicicola  (ATCC)
94
ATCC fungus a brassicicola
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
Fungus A Brassicicola, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pmc06638892-509-4-7?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fungus a brassicicola - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cbs 114 07  (ATCC)
90
ATCC cbs 114 07
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
Cbs 114 07, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pmc03713888-155-8-17?v=ATCC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cbs 114 07 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
d 5 093  (ATCC)
90
ATCC d 5 093
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
D 5 093, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pmc04291350-409-162-192?v=ATCC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d 5 093 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
atcc 11680  (ATCC)
93
ATCC atcc 11680
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
Atcc 11680, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/pmc04387663-1-3-3?v=ATCC
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
atcc 11680 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tw300  (ATCC)
92
ATCC tw300
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
Tw300, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/us09681619-615-5-1?v=ATCC
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tw300 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pta  (ATCC)
90
ATCC pta
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
Pta, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/us08471125-309-7-4?v=ATCC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pta - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
c perfringens strain dsm 11784  (ATCC)
94
ATCC c perfringens strain dsm 11784
In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the <t>VX2</t> tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2
C Perfringens Strain Dsm 11784, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/alternaria/10__4315_slash_jfp___21___139-220-18-27?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c perfringens strain dsm 11784 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the VX2 tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2

Journal: Magnetic resonance in medicine

Article Title: Extracellular pH mapping of liver cancer on a clinical 3T MRI scanner

doi: 10.1002/mrm.28035

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo pHe mapping using BIRDS with TmDOTP5− in a rabbit liver at 3T. T1 VIBE MR images (A,B) were used to localize the VX2 tumor (red contour) within the liver (blue contour), while the profile of the rabbit body is shown with an orange contour. Two different CSI slices from the same animal were used to show the H2, H3, and H6 MR signals of TmDOTP5− in each voxel, in a part of the liver containing the VX2 tumor (C) and in a part of the liver devoid of any tumor (D). 1H spectra containing the H2, H3, and H6 resonances from tumor (E) and normal liver (F) indicate a high SNR in these voxels (>10), allowing accurate pHe determination (6.80 for the tumor and 7.23 for the normal liver). The pHe maps corresponding to the 2 CSI slices shown in (C) for the liver region with a VX2 tumor and in (D) for a normal liver region are shown in (G) and (H), respectively. The measurements indicate lower average pHe values inside the tumor (6.77 ± 0.03) and in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (6.89 ± 0.09), compared to those for the normal liver (7.22 ± 0.04). All pHe values measured by MR were calculated using Equation 2

Article Snippet: 25 , 29 , 30 VX2 tumors (CRL-6503) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA).

Techniques: In Vivo

Confirmation of tumor pHe with histology. (A) pHe maps overlaid on T1 VIBE images show regions of lower pHe inside the VX2 tumor (red contour) and higher pHe outside the tumor in the rest of the liver (blue contour) surrounded by the rabbit’s abdomen (orange contour). (B) H&E staining shows the VX2 tumor in the lower left and normal liver parenchyma in the upper right corner. (C) IHC staining confirms overexpression of GLUT-1 in cancer cells indicative of their hyperglycolytic phenotype. (D) IHC staining for LAMP-2 demonstrates positive surface staining of cancer cells indicative of exposure to chronic acidosis. The black arrows in (C) and (D) indicate examples of positively stained tumor cells

Journal: Magnetic resonance in medicine

Article Title: Extracellular pH mapping of liver cancer on a clinical 3T MRI scanner

doi: 10.1002/mrm.28035

Figure Lengend Snippet: Confirmation of tumor pHe with histology. (A) pHe maps overlaid on T1 VIBE images show regions of lower pHe inside the VX2 tumor (red contour) and higher pHe outside the tumor in the rest of the liver (blue contour) surrounded by the rabbit’s abdomen (orange contour). (B) H&E staining shows the VX2 tumor in the lower left and normal liver parenchyma in the upper right corner. (C) IHC staining confirms overexpression of GLUT-1 in cancer cells indicative of their hyperglycolytic phenotype. (D) IHC staining for LAMP-2 demonstrates positive surface staining of cancer cells indicative of exposure to chronic acidosis. The black arrows in (C) and (D) indicate examples of positively stained tumor cells

Article Snippet: 25 , 29 , 30 VX2 tumors (CRL-6503) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA).

Techniques: Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Over Expression

Distribution of pHe values in the rabbit liver with VX2 tumors. The voxel fraction with pH values within every 0.02 pH interval (A) was calculated for all voxels inside the VX2 tumors (red), at the tumor edge (orange), and for normal liver (blue). The mean pH value, pHm (B), and the corresponding SD (indicated by the error bars) were calculated from the fit of the pH voxel fraction to a Gaussian distribution (A) inside the VX2 tumors (red), at the tumor edge (orange), and in the normal liver (blue) according to Equation 3. Significantly lower pHe values were measured inside the tumor (pHm = 6.79 ± 0.08; P < 10−9) and at tumor edge (pHm = 6.88 ± 0.09; P < 10−7), compared to the pHe values measured in the normal liver (pHm = 7.19 ± 0.04). The pHe values inside the tumor are also significantly lower than those in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (P < .05)

Journal: Magnetic resonance in medicine

Article Title: Extracellular pH mapping of liver cancer on a clinical 3T MRI scanner

doi: 10.1002/mrm.28035

Figure Lengend Snippet: Distribution of pHe values in the rabbit liver with VX2 tumors. The voxel fraction with pH values within every 0.02 pH interval (A) was calculated for all voxels inside the VX2 tumors (red), at the tumor edge (orange), and for normal liver (blue). The mean pH value, pHm (B), and the corresponding SD (indicated by the error bars) were calculated from the fit of the pH voxel fraction to a Gaussian distribution (A) inside the VX2 tumors (red), at the tumor edge (orange), and in the normal liver (blue) according to Equation 3. Significantly lower pHe values were measured inside the tumor (pHm = 6.79 ± 0.08; P < 10−9) and at tumor edge (pHm = 6.88 ± 0.09; P < 10−7), compared to the pHe values measured in the normal liver (pHm = 7.19 ± 0.04). The pHe values inside the tumor are also significantly lower than those in the immediate vicinity of the tumor (P < .05)

Article Snippet: 25 , 29 , 30 VX2 tumors (CRL-6503) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA).

Techniques: