Review



ubc9  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress ubc9
    Ubc9, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ubc9/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    MedChemExpress ubc9
    Ubc9, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ubc9/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc ubc9
    a Immunofluorescence images and quantification (n = 20) of SUMO1 (green) and SUMO2/3 (red) conjugation in RAW264.7 cells with or without STM 14028S infection (4 hpi). Scale bar, 10 µm. b Core SUMO cycle enzymes and their corresponding primary genes (blue). c, d Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of SUMO cycle enzyme expression in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM 14028S vs uninfected controls (4 hpi; n = 3). e <t>UBC9</t> mRNA expression in RAW264.7 cells during STM 14028S infection (0-6 hpi; n = 3). f Immunoblot analysis and quantification of UBC9 protein levels in STM 14028S-infected RAW264.7 cells (0-6 hpi; n = 3). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
    Ubc9, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ubc9/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Abmart Inc rabbit polyclonal anti ubc9
    a Immunofluorescence images and quantification (n = 20) of SUMO1 (green) and SUMO2/3 (red) conjugation in RAW264.7 cells with or without STM 14028S infection (4 hpi). Scale bar, 10 µm. b Core SUMO cycle enzymes and their corresponding primary genes (blue). c, d Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of SUMO cycle enzyme expression in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM 14028S vs uninfected controls (4 hpi; n = 3). e <t>UBC9</t> mRNA expression in RAW264.7 cells during STM 14028S infection (0-6 hpi; n = 3). f Immunoblot analysis and quantification of UBC9 protein levels in STM 14028S-infected RAW264.7 cells (0-6 hpi; n = 3). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Ubc9, supplied by Abmart Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti ubc9/product/Abmart Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech 1 ap
    a Immunofluorescence images and quantification (n = 20) of SUMO1 (green) and SUMO2/3 (red) conjugation in RAW264.7 cells with or without STM 14028S infection (4 hpi). Scale bar, 10 µm. b Core SUMO cycle enzymes and their corresponding primary genes (blue). c, d Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of SUMO cycle enzyme expression in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM 14028S vs uninfected controls (4 hpi; n = 3). e <t>UBC9</t> mRNA expression in RAW264.7 cells during STM 14028S infection (0-6 hpi; n = 3). f Immunoblot analysis and quantification of UBC9 protein levels in STM 14028S-infected RAW264.7 cells (0-6 hpi; n = 3). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
    1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/1 ap/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology ubc9
    a Immunofluorescence images and quantification (n = 20) of SUMO1 (green) and SUMO2/3 (red) conjugation in RAW264.7 cells with or without STM 14028S infection (4 hpi). Scale bar, 10 µm. b Core SUMO cycle enzymes and their corresponding primary genes (blue). c, d Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of SUMO cycle enzyme expression in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM 14028S vs uninfected controls (4 hpi; n = 3). e <t>UBC9</t> mRNA expression in RAW264.7 cells during STM 14028S infection (0-6 hpi; n = 3). f Immunoblot analysis and quantification of UBC9 protein levels in STM 14028S-infected RAW264.7 cells (0-6 hpi; n = 3). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
    Ubc9, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ubc9/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech α ubc9
    FOXL2 SUMOylation intricately regulates increased expression in CAFs. ( A ) SUMOylation sites of FOXL2 was analyzed by SUMOplot™ analysis. Shown are the top 7 predicted lysine residues; ( B ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to confirm the predicted SUMOylation sites using HA-tagged wild-type (WT), or the K25R, K87R, K114R, K150R, and 4KR (where K25, K87, K114 and K150 were all mutated to R). Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of SUMOylated-FOXL2/Total FOXL2; ( C ) The association between SUMOylation and FOXL2 stability was determined by western blotting in HEK-293T cells using α-HA. Cells were transfected with either HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-K25/87R (double mutant, 2KR). The membrane was stripped and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( D ) Cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or, HA-FOXL2-2KR ± His-SUMO1. CHX (100 µg/ml) was added to inhibit translation allowing tracking of FOXL2 stability in the presence and absence of His-SUMO1. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( E ) DMSO (control), MG132 (proteasome inhibitor) or chloroquine (lysosome inhibitor) were added into HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, before CHX (100 µg/ml) was added. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot; ( F ) IP assay was used to test the association between FOXL2 SUMOylation and ubiquitination. Lysates obtained from HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, along with <t>FLAG-UBC9,</t> were immunoprecipitated using α-HA antibody and then probed with α-FLAG antibody. Shown is a representative blot; *, *** P < 0.05, P < 0.001
    α Ubc9, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/α ubc9/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    α ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti ubc9
    FOXL2 SUMOylation intricately regulates increased expression in CAFs. ( A ) SUMOylation sites of FOXL2 was analyzed by SUMOplot™ analysis. Shown are the top 7 predicted lysine residues; ( B ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to confirm the predicted SUMOylation sites using HA-tagged wild-type (WT), or the K25R, K87R, K114R, K150R, and 4KR (where K25, K87, K114 and K150 were all mutated to R). Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of SUMOylated-FOXL2/Total FOXL2; ( C ) The association between SUMOylation and FOXL2 stability was determined by western blotting in HEK-293T cells using α-HA. Cells were transfected with either HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-K25/87R (double mutant, 2KR). The membrane was stripped and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( D ) Cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or, HA-FOXL2-2KR ± His-SUMO1. CHX (100 µg/ml) was added to inhibit translation allowing tracking of FOXL2 stability in the presence and absence of His-SUMO1. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( E ) DMSO (control), MG132 (proteasome inhibitor) or chloroquine (lysosome inhibitor) were added into HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, before CHX (100 µg/ml) was added. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot; ( F ) IP assay was used to test the association between FOXL2 SUMOylation and ubiquitination. Lysates obtained from HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, along with <t>FLAG-UBC9,</t> were immunoprecipitated using α-HA antibody and then probed with α-FLAG antibody. Shown is a representative blot; *, *** P < 0.05, P < 0.001
    Anti Ubc9, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ubc9/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Huabio Inc ubc9
    ZNF33B enhanced SUMO conjugation to JEV NS5. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with <t>UBC9-V5,</t> NS5-FLAG, and pEYFP-SUMO1, pEYFP-SUMO2, or pEYFP-SUMO3. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( B–D ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG and pEYFP-SUMO1, pEYFP-SUMO2, or pEYFP-SUMO3. The expression of NS5 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( E and F ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T and SK6 cells infected with JEV, followed by DMSO or the SUMOylation inhibitor 2-D08 (0–200 μM) treatment for 6 h. ( G and H ) The viral titration analysis of the supernatant in JEV-infected cells treated with 2-D08 was conducted by plaque assay. The statistical analysis of JEV titer in 2-D08-treated cells. ( I ) Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, followed by JEV infection. The expression of ZNF33B was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( J ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG, pEYFP-SUMO1, and UBC9-V5, followed by treatment with 2-D08 (200 µM). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-HA antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins and subsequently probed with specific antibodies to confirm the conjugation of SUMO1 to NS5. ( K–M ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of ZNF33B and its truncations on JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and ZNF33B-HA, ZNF33B ZFs-HA, or ZNF33B ΔZFs-HA. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and data are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001).
    Ubc9, supplied by Huabio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ubc9/product/Huabio Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ubc9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Immunofluorescence images and quantification (n = 20) of SUMO1 (green) and SUMO2/3 (red) conjugation in RAW264.7 cells with or without STM 14028S infection (4 hpi). Scale bar, 10 µm. b Core SUMO cycle enzymes and their corresponding primary genes (blue). c, d Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of SUMO cycle enzyme expression in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM 14028S vs uninfected controls (4 hpi; n = 3). e UBC9 mRNA expression in RAW264.7 cells during STM 14028S infection (0-6 hpi; n = 3). f Immunoblot analysis and quantification of UBC9 protein levels in STM 14028S-infected RAW264.7 cells (0-6 hpi; n = 3). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A bacterial effector blocks SUMOylation by steric occlusion of UBC9 via arginine-GlcNAcylation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Immunofluorescence images and quantification (n = 20) of SUMO1 (green) and SUMO2/3 (red) conjugation in RAW264.7 cells with or without STM 14028S infection (4 hpi). Scale bar, 10 µm. b Core SUMO cycle enzymes and their corresponding primary genes (blue). c, d Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of SUMO cycle enzyme expression in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM 14028S vs uninfected controls (4 hpi; n = 3). e UBC9 mRNA expression in RAW264.7 cells during STM 14028S infection (0-6 hpi; n = 3). f Immunoblot analysis and quantification of UBC9 protein levels in STM 14028S-infected RAW264.7 cells (0-6 hpi; n = 3). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Unique primary antibodies used in this study included UBC9 (CST, #4786), SUMO1 (Proteintech, 67557-1-lg), SUMO2/3 (Proteintech, 67154-1-lg), arginine-GlcNAcylation antibody (Abcam, EPR18251), Myd88 (Proteintech, 67969-1-lg), HSPA8 (Proteintech, 10654-1-AP), PDCD4 (Proteintech, 84162-3-RR).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Conjugation Assay, Infection, Expressing, Western Blot

    a Schematic of the Y2H screening workflow and pairwise interaction validation strategy. b Representative positive colonies on selective plates; four colonies (blue arrows) correspond to Ube2i (encoding UBC9). c Sequencing analysis of positive clones showing that four independent clones encode Ube2i (orange). d Pairwise interaction assay validating the interaction between SseK1 and UBC9. e Co-IP in HEK293T cells confirming the interaction between SseK1 and UBC9. f In vitro pull-down assay demonstrating direct binding between purified SseK1 and UBC9. g BLI analysis showing the binding kinetics between SseK1 and UBC9 in vitro .

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A bacterial effector blocks SUMOylation by steric occlusion of UBC9 via arginine-GlcNAcylation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic of the Y2H screening workflow and pairwise interaction validation strategy. b Representative positive colonies on selective plates; four colonies (blue arrows) correspond to Ube2i (encoding UBC9). c Sequencing analysis of positive clones showing that four independent clones encode Ube2i (orange). d Pairwise interaction assay validating the interaction between SseK1 and UBC9. e Co-IP in HEK293T cells confirming the interaction between SseK1 and UBC9. f In vitro pull-down assay demonstrating direct binding between purified SseK1 and UBC9. g BLI analysis showing the binding kinetics between SseK1 and UBC9 in vitro .

    Article Snippet: Unique primary antibodies used in this study included UBC9 (CST, #4786), SUMO1 (Proteintech, 67557-1-lg), SUMO2/3 (Proteintech, 67154-1-lg), arginine-GlcNAcylation antibody (Abcam, EPR18251), Myd88 (Proteintech, 67969-1-lg), HSPA8 (Proteintech, 10654-1-AP), PDCD4 (Proteintech, 84162-3-RR).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Sequencing, Clone Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, In Vitro, Pull Down Assay, Binding Assay, Purification

    a HEK293T cells expressing Flag-UBC9 were infected with STM WT or Δ sseK1 , followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation. b In vitro enzymatic assays showing Arg-GlcNAcylation of bacterially expressed 6×His-UBC9, detected by immunoblotting. c MS/MS spectrum of Arg-GlcNAcylated Flag-UBC9 peptides. Corresponding b and y ions are indicated along the peptide sequence above the spectrum. d Immunoblot analysis and quantification (normalized to Coomassie-stained protein, n = 3) of Arg-GlcNAcylation of UBC9 and UBC9 R17A. **P < 0.01.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A bacterial effector blocks SUMOylation by steric occlusion of UBC9 via arginine-GlcNAcylation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a HEK293T cells expressing Flag-UBC9 were infected with STM WT or Δ sseK1 , followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation. b In vitro enzymatic assays showing Arg-GlcNAcylation of bacterially expressed 6×His-UBC9, detected by immunoblotting. c MS/MS spectrum of Arg-GlcNAcylated Flag-UBC9 peptides. Corresponding b and y ions are indicated along the peptide sequence above the spectrum. d Immunoblot analysis and quantification (normalized to Coomassie-stained protein, n = 3) of Arg-GlcNAcylation of UBC9 and UBC9 R17A. **P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: Unique primary antibodies used in this study included UBC9 (CST, #4786), SUMO1 (Proteintech, 67557-1-lg), SUMO2/3 (Proteintech, 67154-1-lg), arginine-GlcNAcylation antibody (Abcam, EPR18251), Myd88 (Proteintech, 67969-1-lg), HSPA8 (Proteintech, 10654-1-AP), PDCD4 (Proteintech, 84162-3-RR).

    Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, In Vitro, Tandem Mass Spectroscopy, Sequencing, Staining

    a Crystal structure of the UBC9-SUMO1 complex (PDB: 2UYZ). b Predicted structure of the UBC9-SUMO2 complex generated using AlphaFold3. Enlarged views of the UBC9-SUMO1 and UBC9-SUMO2 interfaces are highlighted in black boxes. Residues forming hydrogen bonds with UBC9 R17 are shown in stick representation. c Purification of 6×His-UBC9 from E. coli BL21(DE3) co-expressing pSseK1 and pUBC9, followed by immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation. d Purification of SUMO1 and SUMO2 proteins from E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pSUMO1 or pSUMO2, respectively. M, molecular weight marker. e, f MST analysis of the binding affinities between SUMO1 or SUMO2 and unmodified UBC9 or Arg-GlcNAcylated UBC9.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A bacterial effector blocks SUMOylation by steric occlusion of UBC9 via arginine-GlcNAcylation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Crystal structure of the UBC9-SUMO1 complex (PDB: 2UYZ). b Predicted structure of the UBC9-SUMO2 complex generated using AlphaFold3. Enlarged views of the UBC9-SUMO1 and UBC9-SUMO2 interfaces are highlighted in black boxes. Residues forming hydrogen bonds with UBC9 R17 are shown in stick representation. c Purification of 6×His-UBC9 from E. coli BL21(DE3) co-expressing pSseK1 and pUBC9, followed by immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation. d Purification of SUMO1 and SUMO2 proteins from E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pSUMO1 or pSUMO2, respectively. M, molecular weight marker. e, f MST analysis of the binding affinities between SUMO1 or SUMO2 and unmodified UBC9 or Arg-GlcNAcylated UBC9.

    Article Snippet: Unique primary antibodies used in this study included UBC9 (CST, #4786), SUMO1 (Proteintech, 67557-1-lg), SUMO2/3 (Proteintech, 67154-1-lg), arginine-GlcNAcylation antibody (Abcam, EPR18251), Myd88 (Proteintech, 67969-1-lg), HSPA8 (Proteintech, 10654-1-AP), PDCD4 (Proteintech, 84162-3-RR).

    Techniques: Generated, Purification, Expressing, Western Blot, Molecular Weight, Marker, Binding Assay

    a Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation mediated by SseK1, SseK2, or SseK3. b AlphaFold-predicted structures of SseK1 (aa 29-336, red), SseK2 (aa 29-348, yellow), and SseK3 (aa 29-335, green), shown with structural alignment using PyMOL. c AlphaFold-modeled structure of the SseK1-UBC9 complex. The enlarged view of the lid-domain region is boxed in black. Residues in the SseK1 lid domain forming hydrogen bonds with UBC9 are shown in stick representation. d Sequence alignment of SseK1, SseK2, and SseK3 generated using ESPript 3.0. e Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation mediated by SseK1, SseK1 A332_Q336del, SseK3, and SseK3 R332delinsARHVQ. f Immunoblot analysis of SUMO2/3 conjugation in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM Δ sseK1 , STM Δ sseK1 complemented with SseK1, or STM Δ sseK1 complemented with either SseK1 D223_D225delinsAAA or SseK1 A332_Q336del (4 hpi). g Phylogenetic analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium SseK1 homologs. Protein sequences homologous to SseK1 (UniProt accession: A0A0H3NK84) were identified using BLASTP analysis against the UniProtKB reference proteomes and Swiss-Prot databases. Sequences with an E-value < 0.05 were selected for phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) online tool.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A bacterial effector blocks SUMOylation by steric occlusion of UBC9 via arginine-GlcNAcylation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation mediated by SseK1, SseK2, or SseK3. b AlphaFold-predicted structures of SseK1 (aa 29-336, red), SseK2 (aa 29-348, yellow), and SseK3 (aa 29-335, green), shown with structural alignment using PyMOL. c AlphaFold-modeled structure of the SseK1-UBC9 complex. The enlarged view of the lid-domain region is boxed in black. Residues in the SseK1 lid domain forming hydrogen bonds with UBC9 are shown in stick representation. d Sequence alignment of SseK1, SseK2, and SseK3 generated using ESPript 3.0. e Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 Arg-GlcNAcylation mediated by SseK1, SseK1 A332_Q336del, SseK3, and SseK3 R332delinsARHVQ. f Immunoblot analysis of SUMO2/3 conjugation in RAW264.7 cells infected with STM Δ sseK1 , STM Δ sseK1 complemented with SseK1, or STM Δ sseK1 complemented with either SseK1 D223_D225delinsAAA or SseK1 A332_Q336del (4 hpi). g Phylogenetic analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium SseK1 homologs. Protein sequences homologous to SseK1 (UniProt accession: A0A0H3NK84) were identified using BLASTP analysis against the UniProtKB reference proteomes and Swiss-Prot databases. Sequences with an E-value < 0.05 were selected for phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) online tool.

    Article Snippet: Unique primary antibodies used in this study included UBC9 (CST, #4786), SUMO1 (Proteintech, 67557-1-lg), SUMO2/3 (Proteintech, 67154-1-lg), arginine-GlcNAcylation antibody (Abcam, EPR18251), Myd88 (Proteintech, 67969-1-lg), HSPA8 (Proteintech, 10654-1-AP), PDCD4 (Proteintech, 84162-3-RR).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Sequencing, Generated, Conjugation Assay, Infection, Construct

    Approximately two hours after entering macrophages, Salmonella activates its T3SS-2 to deliver effector proteins, including SseK1, SseK2 and SseK3, into the cytoplasm. Among these effectors, SseK1 uniquely engages UBC9 through its unique lid domain and catalyzes arginine-GlcNAcylation of UBC9 at residue R17. This modification prevents UBC9 from forming the UBC9-SUMO thioester intermediate, thereby blocking SUMO conjugation onto a broad set of antimicrobial substrates and impairing their activity, stability or localization. By blocking this SUMO-dependent arm of the host immune response, Salmonella evades host antimicrobial defenses, thereby promoting its survival and enhancing virulence.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A bacterial effector blocks SUMOylation by steric occlusion of UBC9 via arginine-GlcNAcylation

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Approximately two hours after entering macrophages, Salmonella activates its T3SS-2 to deliver effector proteins, including SseK1, SseK2 and SseK3, into the cytoplasm. Among these effectors, SseK1 uniquely engages UBC9 through its unique lid domain and catalyzes arginine-GlcNAcylation of UBC9 at residue R17. This modification prevents UBC9 from forming the UBC9-SUMO thioester intermediate, thereby blocking SUMO conjugation onto a broad set of antimicrobial substrates and impairing their activity, stability or localization. By blocking this SUMO-dependent arm of the host immune response, Salmonella evades host antimicrobial defenses, thereby promoting its survival and enhancing virulence.

    Article Snippet: Unique primary antibodies used in this study included UBC9 (CST, #4786), SUMO1 (Proteintech, 67557-1-lg), SUMO2/3 (Proteintech, 67154-1-lg), arginine-GlcNAcylation antibody (Abcam, EPR18251), Myd88 (Proteintech, 67969-1-lg), HSPA8 (Proteintech, 10654-1-AP), PDCD4 (Proteintech, 84162-3-RR).

    Techniques: Residue, Modification, Blocking Assay, Conjugation Assay, Activity Assay

    FOXL2 SUMOylation intricately regulates increased expression in CAFs. ( A ) SUMOylation sites of FOXL2 was analyzed by SUMOplot™ analysis. Shown are the top 7 predicted lysine residues; ( B ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to confirm the predicted SUMOylation sites using HA-tagged wild-type (WT), or the K25R, K87R, K114R, K150R, and 4KR (where K25, K87, K114 and K150 were all mutated to R). Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of SUMOylated-FOXL2/Total FOXL2; ( C ) The association between SUMOylation and FOXL2 stability was determined by western blotting in HEK-293T cells using α-HA. Cells were transfected with either HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-K25/87R (double mutant, 2KR). The membrane was stripped and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( D ) Cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or, HA-FOXL2-2KR ± His-SUMO1. CHX (100 µg/ml) was added to inhibit translation allowing tracking of FOXL2 stability in the presence and absence of His-SUMO1. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( E ) DMSO (control), MG132 (proteasome inhibitor) or chloroquine (lysosome inhibitor) were added into HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, before CHX (100 µg/ml) was added. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot; ( F ) IP assay was used to test the association between FOXL2 SUMOylation and ubiquitination. Lysates obtained from HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, along with FLAG-UBC9, were immunoprecipitated using α-HA antibody and then probed with α-FLAG antibody. Shown is a representative blot; *, *** P < 0.05, P < 0.001

    Journal: BMC Cancer

    Article Title: FOXL2 + cancer-associated fibroblasts enhances epithelial ovarian cancer development via TGFβ/Smad signaling

    doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15364-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FOXL2 SUMOylation intricately regulates increased expression in CAFs. ( A ) SUMOylation sites of FOXL2 was analyzed by SUMOplot™ analysis. Shown are the top 7 predicted lysine residues; ( B ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to confirm the predicted SUMOylation sites using HA-tagged wild-type (WT), or the K25R, K87R, K114R, K150R, and 4KR (where K25, K87, K114 and K150 were all mutated to R). Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of SUMOylated-FOXL2/Total FOXL2; ( C ) The association between SUMOylation and FOXL2 stability was determined by western blotting in HEK-293T cells using α-HA. Cells were transfected with either HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-K25/87R (double mutant, 2KR). The membrane was stripped and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( D ) Cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or, HA-FOXL2-2KR ± His-SUMO1. CHX (100 µg/ml) was added to inhibit translation allowing tracking of FOXL2 stability in the presence and absence of His-SUMO1. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot and densitometry analysis of three technical replicates; ( E ) DMSO (control), MG132 (proteasome inhibitor) or chloroquine (lysosome inhibitor) were added into HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, before CHX (100 µg/ml) was added. Blots were probed with α-HA and re-probed with GAPDH to confirm equivalent loading. Shown is a representative blot; ( F ) IP assay was used to test the association between FOXL2 SUMOylation and ubiquitination. Lysates obtained from HEK-293T cells transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT or HA-FOXL2-2KR, along with FLAG-UBC9, were immunoprecipitated using α-HA antibody and then probed with α-FLAG antibody. Shown is a representative blot; *, *** P < 0.05, P < 0.001

    Article Snippet: The different primary antibodies used were α-SUMO1 (67559-1-Ig, 1:3000), α-UBC9 (10070-1-AP, 1:2000), α-Vimentin (10366-1-AP, 1:5000), α-N-cadherin (22018-1-AP, 1:5000), α-E-cadherin (20874-1-AP, 1:20000) (Proteintech, Wuhan, China); α-HA (A02041, 1:800), α-His (A02050, 1:800), α-Flag (A02010, 1:800) (Abbkine, Wuhan, China); α-FOXL2 (ab246511, 1:1000), α-Snail (ab216347, 1:1000) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); and, α-Smad2/3 (D7G7, 1:1000), α-p-Smad2 (Ser465/467)/Smad3 (Ser423/425) (D27F4, 1:1000) (CST, Boston, MA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, In Vitro, Western Blot, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Membrane, Control, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Immunoprecipitation

    FOXL2 SUMOylation requires SUMO1 and UBC9/UBE2I. ( A ) Putative interaction of FOXL2 with SUMO1, SUMO2, SUMO3, and SUMO4 was detected by String analysis ( https://cn.string-db.org/ ); ( B ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to confirm String analysis’s prediction of SUMO1, HEK-293T cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT, FLAG-UBC9, and His-SUMO1-4. In vitro SUMOylation assay using Ni 2+ -NTA pull-down determined that FOXL2 was mainly modified by SUMO1. Shown is a representative blot; ( C ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to determine whether UBC9 is compulsorily required for FOXL2 SUMOylation. HEK-293T cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT and His-SUMO1 ± FLAG-UBC9. In vitro SUMOylation using Ni 2+ -NTA pull-down assay determined that UBC9 is required for FOXL2 SUMOylation. Shown is a representative blot; ( D ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to determine whether UBC9 is compulsorily required for FOXL2 SUMOylation in CAFs. CAFs were transduced using either a non-targeting control shRNA or shRNA targeting UBC9 . Transduced cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT and His-SUMO1. In vitro SUMOylation using Ni 2+ -NTA pull-down assay determined that UBC9 is required for FOXL2 SUMOylation. Shown is a representative blot

    Journal: BMC Cancer

    Article Title: FOXL2 + cancer-associated fibroblasts enhances epithelial ovarian cancer development via TGFβ/Smad signaling

    doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15364-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FOXL2 SUMOylation requires SUMO1 and UBC9/UBE2I. ( A ) Putative interaction of FOXL2 with SUMO1, SUMO2, SUMO3, and SUMO4 was detected by String analysis ( https://cn.string-db.org/ ); ( B ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to confirm String analysis’s prediction of SUMO1, HEK-293T cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT, FLAG-UBC9, and His-SUMO1-4. In vitro SUMOylation assay using Ni 2+ -NTA pull-down determined that FOXL2 was mainly modified by SUMO1. Shown is a representative blot; ( C ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to determine whether UBC9 is compulsorily required for FOXL2 SUMOylation. HEK-293T cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT and His-SUMO1 ± FLAG-UBC9. In vitro SUMOylation using Ni 2+ -NTA pull-down assay determined that UBC9 is required for FOXL2 SUMOylation. Shown is a representative blot; ( D ) In vitro sumoylation assay was employed to determine whether UBC9 is compulsorily required for FOXL2 SUMOylation in CAFs. CAFs were transduced using either a non-targeting control shRNA or shRNA targeting UBC9 . Transduced cells were transfected with HA-FOXL2-WT and His-SUMO1. In vitro SUMOylation using Ni 2+ -NTA pull-down assay determined that UBC9 is required for FOXL2 SUMOylation. Shown is a representative blot

    Article Snippet: The different primary antibodies used were α-SUMO1 (67559-1-Ig, 1:3000), α-UBC9 (10070-1-AP, 1:2000), α-Vimentin (10366-1-AP, 1:5000), α-N-cadherin (22018-1-AP, 1:5000), α-E-cadherin (20874-1-AP, 1:20000) (Proteintech, Wuhan, China); α-HA (A02041, 1:800), α-His (A02050, 1:800), α-Flag (A02010, 1:800) (Abbkine, Wuhan, China); α-FOXL2 (ab246511, 1:1000), α-Snail (ab216347, 1:1000) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); and, α-Smad2/3 (D7G7, 1:1000), α-p-Smad2 (Ser465/467)/Smad3 (Ser423/425) (D27F4, 1:1000) (CST, Boston, MA, USA).

    Techniques: In Vitro, Transfection, Modification, Pull Down Assay, Control, shRNA

    ZNF33B enhanced SUMO conjugation to JEV NS5. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and pEYFP-SUMO1, pEYFP-SUMO2, or pEYFP-SUMO3. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( B–D ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG and pEYFP-SUMO1, pEYFP-SUMO2, or pEYFP-SUMO3. The expression of NS5 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( E and F ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T and SK6 cells infected with JEV, followed by DMSO or the SUMOylation inhibitor 2-D08 (0–200 μM) treatment for 6 h. ( G and H ) The viral titration analysis of the supernatant in JEV-infected cells treated with 2-D08 was conducted by plaque assay. The statistical analysis of JEV titer in 2-D08-treated cells. ( I ) Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, followed by JEV infection. The expression of ZNF33B was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( J ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG, pEYFP-SUMO1, and UBC9-V5, followed by treatment with 2-D08 (200 µM). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-HA antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins and subsequently probed with specific antibodies to confirm the conjugation of SUMO1 to NS5. ( K–M ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of ZNF33B and its truncations on JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and ZNF33B-HA, ZNF33B ZFs-HA, or ZNF33B ΔZFs-HA. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and data are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001).

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: ZNF33B facilitates Japanese encephalitis virus replication by controlling HSPB1/8-mediated SUMOylation of nonstructural protein 5

    doi: 10.1128/jvi.00868-25

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ZNF33B enhanced SUMO conjugation to JEV NS5. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and pEYFP-SUMO1, pEYFP-SUMO2, or pEYFP-SUMO3. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( B–D ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG and pEYFP-SUMO1, pEYFP-SUMO2, or pEYFP-SUMO3. The expression of NS5 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( E and F ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T and SK6 cells infected with JEV, followed by DMSO or the SUMOylation inhibitor 2-D08 (0–200 μM) treatment for 6 h. ( G and H ) The viral titration analysis of the supernatant in JEV-infected cells treated with 2-D08 was conducted by plaque assay. The statistical analysis of JEV titer in 2-D08-treated cells. ( I ) Immunoblot analysis of UBC9 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, followed by JEV infection. The expression of ZNF33B was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( J ) Immunoblot analysis of lysates from HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG, pEYFP-SUMO1, and UBC9-V5, followed by treatment with 2-D08 (200 µM). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-HA antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins and subsequently probed with specific antibodies to confirm the conjugation of SUMO1 to NS5. ( K–M ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of ZNF33B and its truncations on JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and ZNF33B-HA, ZNF33B ZFs-HA, or ZNF33B ΔZFs-HA. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and data are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: The antibody probed by UBC9 (Cat. # HA500401 ) was obtained from HUABIO (China).

    Techniques: Conjugation Assay, Western Blot, Transfection, Expressing, Software, Infection, Titration, Plaque Assay

    Lysine residues 269 and 846 are critical for ZNF33B-promoted NS5 SUMOylation. ( A ) The diagram illustration of SUMOylation site prediction from Advanced Services of GPS-SUMO 2.0 ( https://sumo.biocuckoo.cn/online.php ), JASSA version 4 ( http://www.jassa.fr ), and SUMOplot Analysis Program ( https://www.abcepta.com/sumoplot ) websites. The overlap of predicted sites is shown in the bottom table. ( B–D ) Immunoblot analysis of NS5 SUMOylation in HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, pEYFP-SUMO1, ZNF33B-MYC, and the WT or mutant constructs of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the lysine residues at positions 269 ( B ), 287 ( C ), and 846 ( D ). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-GFP antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( E–G ) Immunoblot analysis of the K269R ( E ), K287R ( F ), and K846R ( G ) mutations on the association of ZNF33B with JEV NS5 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC and NS5-FLAG. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( H ) Confocal microscope observation of the colocalization of ZNF33B with the WT or mutations of NS5 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-HA and NS5-FLAG with arginine replacement of the lysine residues at positions 269, 287, and 846. Scale bar, 2 µm. ( I ) Left, sequence alignment of SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) derived from some E3 SUMO enzymes or flaviviruses NS5 proteins, with the dotted line indicating potential SIM. Right, a diagram depicting the SIMs generated by WebLogo ( https://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi ). ( J ) The interaction model of JEV NS5 SIM and SUMO1 was generated by AlphaFold Server. The putative interacting amino acids were identified and annotated using PyMOL software. ( K ) Immunoblot analysis of JEV NS5 SUMOylation in HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, pEYFP-SUMO1, ZNF33B-MYC, and the WT or mutant construct of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the SIM (V-I-D-L to 4R). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( L ) Immunoblot analysis of the SIM mutations on the association of ZNF33B with JEV NS5 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC and NS5-FLAG. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: ZNF33B facilitates Japanese encephalitis virus replication by controlling HSPB1/8-mediated SUMOylation of nonstructural protein 5

    doi: 10.1128/jvi.00868-25

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Lysine residues 269 and 846 are critical for ZNF33B-promoted NS5 SUMOylation. ( A ) The diagram illustration of SUMOylation site prediction from Advanced Services of GPS-SUMO 2.0 ( https://sumo.biocuckoo.cn/online.php ), JASSA version 4 ( http://www.jassa.fr ), and SUMOplot Analysis Program ( https://www.abcepta.com/sumoplot ) websites. The overlap of predicted sites is shown in the bottom table. ( B–D ) Immunoblot analysis of NS5 SUMOylation in HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, pEYFP-SUMO1, ZNF33B-MYC, and the WT or mutant constructs of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the lysine residues at positions 269 ( B ), 287 ( C ), and 846 ( D ). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-GFP antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( E–G ) Immunoblot analysis of the K269R ( E ), K287R ( F ), and K846R ( G ) mutations on the association of ZNF33B with JEV NS5 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC and NS5-FLAG. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( H ) Confocal microscope observation of the colocalization of ZNF33B with the WT or mutations of NS5 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-HA and NS5-FLAG with arginine replacement of the lysine residues at positions 269, 287, and 846. Scale bar, 2 µm. ( I ) Left, sequence alignment of SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) derived from some E3 SUMO enzymes or flaviviruses NS5 proteins, with the dotted line indicating potential SIM. Right, a diagram depicting the SIMs generated by WebLogo ( https://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi ). ( J ) The interaction model of JEV NS5 SIM and SUMO1 was generated by AlphaFold Server. The putative interacting amino acids were identified and annotated using PyMOL software. ( K ) Immunoblot analysis of JEV NS5 SUMOylation in HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, pEYFP-SUMO1, ZNF33B-MYC, and the WT or mutant construct of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the SIM (V-I-D-L to 4R). The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( L ) Immunoblot analysis of the SIM mutations on the association of ZNF33B with JEV NS5 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC and NS5-FLAG. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody.

    Article Snippet: The antibody probed by UBC9 (Cat. # HA500401 ) was obtained from HUABIO (China).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Construct, Immunoprecipitation, Microscopy, Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Generated, Software

    SUMOylation of JEV NS5 hinders its ubiquitination through competitive binding to lysine residues 269 and 846. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of JEV NS5 SUMOylation on its ubiquitination in HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, pEYFP-SUMO1, NS5-FLAG, and Ubi-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of JEV NS5 deSUMOylation on its ubiquitination in HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG and Ubi-HA, followed by 2-D08 (200 µM) treatment for 6 h. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( C–E ) Immunoblot analysis of the K269R ( C ), K287R ( D ), and K846R ( E ) mutations of JEV NS5 on its ubiquitination by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with Ubi-HA and the WT or mutant constructs of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the lysine residues at positions 269 ( C ), 287 ( D ), and 846 ( E ). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of the SIM mutations of JEV NS5 on its ubiquitination by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with Ubi-HA and the WT or mutant construct of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the SIM (V-I-D-L to 4R). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: ZNF33B facilitates Japanese encephalitis virus replication by controlling HSPB1/8-mediated SUMOylation of nonstructural protein 5

    doi: 10.1128/jvi.00868-25

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SUMOylation of JEV NS5 hinders its ubiquitination through competitive binding to lysine residues 269 and 846. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of JEV NS5 SUMOylation on its ubiquitination in HEK293T cells co-transfected with UBC9-V5, pEYFP-SUMO1, NS5-FLAG, and Ubi-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of JEV NS5 deSUMOylation on its ubiquitination in HEK293T cells co-transfected with NS5-FLAG and Ubi-HA, followed by 2-D08 (200 µM) treatment for 6 h. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( C–E ) Immunoblot analysis of the K269R ( C ), K287R ( D ), and K846R ( E ) mutations of JEV NS5 on its ubiquitination by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with Ubi-HA and the WT or mutant constructs of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the lysine residues at positions 269 ( C ), 287 ( D ), and 846 ( E ). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of the SIM mutations of JEV NS5 on its ubiquitination by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with Ubi-HA and the WT or mutant construct of NS5-FLAG, with arginine replacement of the SIM (V-I-D-L to 4R). The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody.

    Article Snippet: The antibody probed by UBC9 (Cat. # HA500401 ) was obtained from HUABIO (China).

    Techniques: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Binding Assay, Western Blot, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Mutagenesis, Construct

    ZNF33B recruits HSPB1 to facilitate JEV NS5 SUMOylation. ( A ) Silver staining of JEV NS5-associated proteins immunoprecipitated by anti-HA antibodies probe with cell lysates from SK6 cells. The arrows indicate the additional band presented in JEV NS5-associated proteins. ( B and C ) Differentially expressed proteins analyzed by mass spectrometry. ( D and E ) Immunoblot analysis of the association of NS5 with HSPB1 or HSPB8 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with NS5-FLAG and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( F and G ) Confocal microscope observation of the colocalization of NS5 with HSPB1 and HSPB8 in HEK293T cells transfected with NS5-FLAG with HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. Scale bar, 2 µm. ( H and I ) Immunoblot analysis of the expression of JEV NS3 and NS5 in HEK293T cells transfected with HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA, followed by JEV infection. ( J and K ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of HSPB1 and HSPB8 on JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( L ) Immunoblot analysis of the association of UBC9 with HSPB1 or HSPB8 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with UBC9-V5 and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis of the association of ZNF33B with HSPB1 or HSPB8 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-FLAG and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody. ( N ) Immunoblot analysis of HSPB1 and HSPB8 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-HA, followed by JEV infection. The expression of HSPB1 and HSPB8 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( O ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of HSPB1 and HSPB8 depletion on the protein level of ZNF33B-promoted NS5 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, NS5-FLAG, and siRNAs targeting HSPB1 and HSPB8. The expression of NS5 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( P ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of HSPB1 and HSPB8 depletion on ZNF33B-promoted JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and siRNAs targeting HSPB1 and HSPB8. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies.

    Journal: Journal of Virology

    Article Title: ZNF33B facilitates Japanese encephalitis virus replication by controlling HSPB1/8-mediated SUMOylation of nonstructural protein 5

    doi: 10.1128/jvi.00868-25

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ZNF33B recruits HSPB1 to facilitate JEV NS5 SUMOylation. ( A ) Silver staining of JEV NS5-associated proteins immunoprecipitated by anti-HA antibodies probe with cell lysates from SK6 cells. The arrows indicate the additional band presented in JEV NS5-associated proteins. ( B and C ) Differentially expressed proteins analyzed by mass spectrometry. ( D and E ) Immunoblot analysis of the association of NS5 with HSPB1 or HSPB8 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with NS5-FLAG and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. ( F and G ) Confocal microscope observation of the colocalization of NS5 with HSPB1 and HSPB8 in HEK293T cells transfected with NS5-FLAG with HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. Scale bar, 2 µm. ( H and I ) Immunoblot analysis of the expression of JEV NS3 and NS5 in HEK293T cells transfected with HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA, followed by JEV infection. ( J and K ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of HSPB1 and HSPB8 on JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies. ( L ) Immunoblot analysis of the association of UBC9 with HSPB1 or HSPB8 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with UBC9-V5 and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis of the association of ZNF33B with HSPB1 or HSPB8 by immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-FLAG and HSPB1-HA or HSPB8-HA. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody. ( N ) Immunoblot analysis of HSPB1 and HSPB8 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-HA, followed by JEV infection. The expression of HSPB1 and HSPB8 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( O ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of HSPB1 and HSPB8 depletion on the protein level of ZNF33B-promoted NS5 in HEK293T cells transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, NS5-FLAG, and siRNAs targeting HSPB1 and HSPB8. The expression of NS5 was assessed by measuring the band grayscale with the “ImageJ” software. ( P ) Immunoblot analysis of the effect of HSPB1 and HSPB8 depletion on ZNF33B-promoted JEV NS5 SUMOylation from HEK293T cells co-transfected with ZNF33B-MYC, pEYFP-SUMO1, UBC9-V5, NS5-FLAG, and siRNAs targeting HSPB1 and HSPB8. The lysates were subjected to precipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies for the enrichment of SUMOylated proteins, followed by probing with the specified antibodies.

    Article Snippet: The antibody probed by UBC9 (Cat. # HA500401 ) was obtained from HUABIO (China).

    Techniques: Silver Staining, Immunoprecipitation, Mass Spectrometry, Western Blot, Transfection, Microscopy, Expressing, Infection, Software