Review





Similar Products

96
ATCC plc prf 5 plc
Plc Prf 5 Plc, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plc prf 5 plc/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plc prf 5 plc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bioss p plc rabbit ab
P Plc Rabbit Ab, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p plc rabbit ab/product/Bioss
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p plc rabbit ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bioss plc rabbit ab
Plc Rabbit Ab, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plc rabbit ab/product/Bioss
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plc rabbit ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC plc prf 5
Plc Prf 5, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plc prf 5/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plc prf 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC human hepatoma cell line plc prf 5
In vitro evaluation of molnupiravir in HEV cell culture models. (A) Cytotoxicity of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and <t>sofosbuvir</t> <t>in</t> <t>PLC/PRF/5</t> cells and PRH. Three replicates per concentration. Bars represent the mean and SEM. Mean viability at each concentration was compared with the no-drug control group using the Student t test; ** indicates statistically significant difference ( p <0.05). (B) PRH infected with rHEV and treated with either PBS, varying concentrations of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir, as well as combinations. (C) Immunofluorescence staining for rHEV-infected PRH with/without antivirals: uninfected cells (negative control), rHEV-infected cells treated with either PBS (no drug control), sofosbuvir 10 μM, ribavirin 200 μM, or molnupiravir 100 μM. Cells were stained with polyclonal anti-rHEV sera and counterstained with DAPI. (D) PLC/PRF/5 cells infected with HEV infectious clone Kernow-p6, (E) PLC/PRF/5 cells infected with human-derived HEV. Cells were treated with either PBS, varying concentrations of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir, as well as combinations. Error bars represent SEM (n=3 replicates per concentration). Mean viral loads at each concentration were compared with the no-drug control group using the Student t test; * indicates statistically significant difference ( p <0.05) from the untreated mean. ** indicates an extremely statistically significant difference ( p <0.01) from the untreated mean. Abbreviations: HEV, hepatitis E virus; PRH, primary rat hepatocytes; SEM, standard error of the mean; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; rHEV, Rocahepevirus ratti genotype 1; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Human Hepatoma Cell Line Plc Prf 5, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human hepatoma cell line plc prf 5/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human hepatoma cell line plc prf 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC human plc prf 5
Antitumoral effects of the G9a-specific inhibitor EZM8266 (A) Colony formation assays <t>performed</t> <t>in</t> <t>PLC/PRF/5</t> human HCC cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 ( n = 3). (B) Anchorage-independent growth assay performed in PLC/PRF/5 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266. (C and D) Cell migration (C) and cell invasion (D) assays performed in HuH7 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 (48 h pretreatment and 24 h of transwell migration/invasion) ( n = 3). (E) Volcano plot representing all the genes with significant differential expression ( p < 0.05) in PLC/PRF/5 HCC cells treated with EZM8266 (5 μM for 48 h) vs . control cells and most relevant categories of differentially expressed genes identified by Gene Ontology Biological Process (GO-BP) functional classification. (F) GSEA analysis of specific categories including heatmaps with a list of genes modulated by EZM8266 selected from the RNA-seq data. (G) Effect of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination on the expression of selected genes in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (H) Validation of the effects of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination, as indicated above, on the expression of selected genes identified in the RNA-seq analyses in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (I) Experimental protocol for the study of the antitumoral effects of EZM8266 in an orthotopic model of HCC. Representative images of tumors and tumor burden (liver index) in vehicle and EZM8266-treated mice ( n = 9/group). (J) Representative images showing the immunohistochemical detection of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + and CD4 + T cells (yellow arrows) in vehicle- and EZM8266-treated mice. Scale bars, 100 μm, Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 . All the replicates represent biological replicates.
Human Plc Prf 5, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human plc prf 5/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human plc prf 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC crl 8024 tm
Antitumoral effects of the G9a-specific inhibitor EZM8266 (A) Colony formation assays <t>performed</t> <t>in</t> <t>PLC/PRF/5</t> human HCC cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 ( n = 3). (B) Anchorage-independent growth assay performed in PLC/PRF/5 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266. (C and D) Cell migration (C) and cell invasion (D) assays performed in HuH7 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 (48 h pretreatment and 24 h of transwell migration/invasion) ( n = 3). (E) Volcano plot representing all the genes with significant differential expression ( p < 0.05) in PLC/PRF/5 HCC cells treated with EZM8266 (5 μM for 48 h) vs . control cells and most relevant categories of differentially expressed genes identified by Gene Ontology Biological Process (GO-BP) functional classification. (F) GSEA analysis of specific categories including heatmaps with a list of genes modulated by EZM8266 selected from the RNA-seq data. (G) Effect of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination on the expression of selected genes in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (H) Validation of the effects of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination, as indicated above, on the expression of selected genes identified in the RNA-seq analyses in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (I) Experimental protocol for the study of the antitumoral effects of EZM8266 in an orthotopic model of HCC. Representative images of tumors and tumor burden (liver index) in vehicle and EZM8266-treated mice ( n = 9/group). (J) Representative images showing the immunohistochemical detection of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + and CD4 + T cells (yellow arrows) in vehicle- and EZM8266-treated mice. Scale bars, 100 μm, Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 . All the replicates represent biological replicates.
Crl 8024 Tm, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/crl 8024 tm/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
crl 8024 tm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


In vitro evaluation of molnupiravir in HEV cell culture models. (A) Cytotoxicity of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir in PLC/PRF/5 cells and PRH. Three replicates per concentration. Bars represent the mean and SEM. Mean viability at each concentration was compared with the no-drug control group using the Student t test; ** indicates statistically significant difference ( p <0.05). (B) PRH infected with rHEV and treated with either PBS, varying concentrations of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir, as well as combinations. (C) Immunofluorescence staining for rHEV-infected PRH with/without antivirals: uninfected cells (negative control), rHEV-infected cells treated with either PBS (no drug control), sofosbuvir 10 μM, ribavirin 200 μM, or molnupiravir 100 μM. Cells were stained with polyclonal anti-rHEV sera and counterstained with DAPI. (D) PLC/PRF/5 cells infected with HEV infectious clone Kernow-p6, (E) PLC/PRF/5 cells infected with human-derived HEV. Cells were treated with either PBS, varying concentrations of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir, as well as combinations. Error bars represent SEM (n=3 replicates per concentration). Mean viral loads at each concentration were compared with the no-drug control group using the Student t test; * indicates statistically significant difference ( p <0.05) from the untreated mean. ** indicates an extremely statistically significant difference ( p <0.01) from the untreated mean. Abbreviations: HEV, hepatitis E virus; PRH, primary rat hepatocytes; SEM, standard error of the mean; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; rHEV, Rocahepevirus ratti genotype 1; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Journal: Hepatology Communications

Article Title: Molnupiravir is effective against hepatitis E virus infection in an animal model

doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000944

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro evaluation of molnupiravir in HEV cell culture models. (A) Cytotoxicity of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir in PLC/PRF/5 cells and PRH. Three replicates per concentration. Bars represent the mean and SEM. Mean viability at each concentration was compared with the no-drug control group using the Student t test; ** indicates statistically significant difference ( p <0.05). (B) PRH infected with rHEV and treated with either PBS, varying concentrations of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir, as well as combinations. (C) Immunofluorescence staining for rHEV-infected PRH with/without antivirals: uninfected cells (negative control), rHEV-infected cells treated with either PBS (no drug control), sofosbuvir 10 μM, ribavirin 200 μM, or molnupiravir 100 μM. Cells were stained with polyclonal anti-rHEV sera and counterstained with DAPI. (D) PLC/PRF/5 cells infected with HEV infectious clone Kernow-p6, (E) PLC/PRF/5 cells infected with human-derived HEV. Cells were treated with either PBS, varying concentrations of molnupiravir, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir, as well as combinations. Error bars represent SEM (n=3 replicates per concentration). Mean viral loads at each concentration were compared with the no-drug control group using the Student t test; * indicates statistically significant difference ( p <0.05) from the untreated mean. ** indicates an extremely statistically significant difference ( p <0.01) from the untreated mean. Abbreviations: HEV, hepatitis E virus; PRH, primary rat hepatocytes; SEM, standard error of the mean; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; rHEV, Rocahepevirus ratti genotype 1; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Article Snippet: Human hepatoma cell line PLC/PRF/5 (ATCC CRL-8024, LGC Standards, Wesel, Germany) and primary rat hepatocytes (PRH) were used in this study.

Techniques: In Vitro, Cell Culture, Concentration Assay, Control, Infection, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Negative Control, Derivative Assay, Virus, Saline

Antitumoral effects of the G9a-specific inhibitor EZM8266 (A) Colony formation assays performed in PLC/PRF/5 human HCC cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 ( n = 3). (B) Anchorage-independent growth assay performed in PLC/PRF/5 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266. (C and D) Cell migration (C) and cell invasion (D) assays performed in HuH7 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 (48 h pretreatment and 24 h of transwell migration/invasion) ( n = 3). (E) Volcano plot representing all the genes with significant differential expression ( p < 0.05) in PLC/PRF/5 HCC cells treated with EZM8266 (5 μM for 48 h) vs . control cells and most relevant categories of differentially expressed genes identified by Gene Ontology Biological Process (GO-BP) functional classification. (F) GSEA analysis of specific categories including heatmaps with a list of genes modulated by EZM8266 selected from the RNA-seq data. (G) Effect of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination on the expression of selected genes in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (H) Validation of the effects of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination, as indicated above, on the expression of selected genes identified in the RNA-seq analyses in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (I) Experimental protocol for the study of the antitumoral effects of EZM8266 in an orthotopic model of HCC. Representative images of tumors and tumor burden (liver index) in vehicle and EZM8266-treated mice ( n = 9/group). (J) Representative images showing the immunohistochemical detection of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + and CD4 + T cells (yellow arrows) in vehicle- and EZM8266-treated mice. Scale bars, 100 μm, Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 . All the replicates represent biological replicates.

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: Histone methyl-transferase G9a inhibition boosts the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in experimental hepatocellular carcinoma

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102717

Figure Lengend Snippet: Antitumoral effects of the G9a-specific inhibitor EZM8266 (A) Colony formation assays performed in PLC/PRF/5 human HCC cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 ( n = 3). (B) Anchorage-independent growth assay performed in PLC/PRF/5 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266. (C and D) Cell migration (C) and cell invasion (D) assays performed in HuH7 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of EZM8266 (48 h pretreatment and 24 h of transwell migration/invasion) ( n = 3). (E) Volcano plot representing all the genes with significant differential expression ( p < 0.05) in PLC/PRF/5 HCC cells treated with EZM8266 (5 μM for 48 h) vs . control cells and most relevant categories of differentially expressed genes identified by Gene Ontology Biological Process (GO-BP) functional classification. (F) GSEA analysis of specific categories including heatmaps with a list of genes modulated by EZM8266 selected from the RNA-seq data. (G) Effect of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination on the expression of selected genes in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (H) Validation of the effects of EZM8266, IFN-γ, and their combination, as indicated above, on the expression of selected genes identified in the RNA-seq analyses in the murine HCC cell line PM299L ( n = 3). (I) Experimental protocol for the study of the antitumoral effects of EZM8266 in an orthotopic model of HCC. Representative images of tumors and tumor burden (liver index) in vehicle and EZM8266-treated mice ( n = 9/group). (J) Representative images showing the immunohistochemical detection of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and quantification of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + and CD4 + T cells (yellow arrows) in vehicle- and EZM8266-treated mice. Scale bars, 100 μm, Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 . All the replicates represent biological replicates.

Article Snippet: Human: PLC/PRF/5 , ATCC , Cat# CRL-8024 TM.

Techniques: Growth Assay, Migration, Quantitative Proteomics, Control, Functional Assay, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery, Immunohistochemical staining