|
MedChemExpress
pemetrexed Pemetrexed, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/pemetrexed/10__1016_slash_j__ijpx__2026__100558-58-0-4?v=MedChemExpress Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pemetrexed - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Eli Lilly
alimta Alimta, supplied by Eli Lilly, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/pemetrexed/us12655159-436-11-12?v=Eli+Lilly Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
alimta - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Dentsply Sirona
mta Mta, supplied by Dentsply Sirona, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/pemetrexed/pmc13266017-66-38-41?v=Dentsply+Sirona Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mta - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Dentsply Sirona
proroot mta Proroot Mta, supplied by Dentsply Sirona, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/pemetrexed/pm42159272-165-4-6?v=Dentsply+Sirona Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proroot mta - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Eli Lilly
pemetrexed ![]() Pemetrexed, supplied by Eli Lilly, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/pemetrexed/pmc13192031-183-0-2?v=Eli+Lilly Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pemetrexed - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: BMC Cancer
Article Title: Real-world evidence for first-line intrathecal pemetrexed in leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a retrospective cohort study
doi: 10.1186/s12885-026-15915-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: Overall Survival (OS) of patients with Leptomeningeal Metastasis (LM) from the whole cohort and Kaplan–Meier estimates based on clinical characteristics. A The median OS (mOS) of all the patients after diagnosis of LM was 8.0 months. B Patients with high Karnofsky Performance Status scores had better mOS (> 60 versus ≤ 60: 9.0 versus 5.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, P = 0.005). C Patients who had extensive systemic disease with few treatment options had slightly higher mOS (8.0 versus 6.0 months, HR: 0.65, P = 0.014). D Patients who received more than six times of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) had better mOS (> 6 versus ≤ 6: 14.0 versus 5.0 months, HR: 0.41, P < 0.001). E Patients with response for IP treatment had better mOS (effective versus non-effective: 8.0 versus 4.0 months, HR: 0.50, P < 0.001). F Continued negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology after treatment was associated with longer survival (mOS 11.0 versus 5.0 months, HR: 0.42, P < 0.001)
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Biomarker Discovery
Journal: BMC Cancer
Article Title: Real-world evidence for first-line intrathecal pemetrexed in leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a retrospective cohort study
doi: 10.1186/s12885-026-15915-5
Figure Lengend Snippet: The Overall Survival (OS) of patients with Leptomeningeal Metastasis (LM) from the Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cohort and Kaplan–Meier estimates based on clinical characteristics. A The median OS (mOS) of all the patients after diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) was 6.0 months. B Patients with local treatment had better mOS (8.0 versus 3.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, P = 0.023). C Patients who received more than six times of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) had better mOS (> 6 versus ≤ 6: 16.0 versus 4.0 months, HR: 0.33, P < 0.001). D Patients with response for IP treatment had better mOS (effective versus non-effective: 11.0 versus 3.5 months, HR: 0.46, P < 0.001). E Continued negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology after treatment was associated with longer survival (mOS 12.0 versus 4.0 months, HR: 0.41, P < 0.001)
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Biomarker Discovery