Review





Similar Products

meg data analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc meg data analysis
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Data Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/bio_rxiv__2025__05__27__656336-253-1-7?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg phantom data analysis  (Takeda)
90
Takeda meg phantom data analysis
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Phantom Data Analysis, supplied by Takeda, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/pm40218576-552-17-10?v=Takeda
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg phantom data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg data analysis meg data  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc meg data analysis meg data
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Data Analysis Meg Data, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/ppr0616866-138-0-10?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg data analysis meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg data pre-processing and analysis software emegs version 3.1  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc meg data pre-processing and analysis software emegs version 3.1
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Data Pre Processing And Analysis Software Emegs Version 3.1, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/pmc09125677-133-0-8?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg data pre-processing and analysis software emegs version 3.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
brainwave a matlab toolbox for beamformer source analysis of meg data  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc brainwave a matlab toolbox for beamformer source analysis of meg data
Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.
Brainwave A Matlab Toolbox For Beamformer Source Analysis Of Meg Data, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/pmc09043239-14-0-2?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
brainwave a matlab toolbox for beamformer source analysis of meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
software tools for eeg and meg data analysis  (BESA GmbH)
90
BESA GmbH software tools for eeg and meg data analysis
Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.
Software Tools For Eeg And Meg Data Analysis, supplied by BESA GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/pmc08960642-361-20-9?v=BESA+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
software tools for eeg and meg data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab-based in-house toolbox for statistical analysis of meg-eeg data  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab-based in-house toolbox for statistical analysis of meg-eeg data
Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.
Matlab Based In House Toolbox For Statistical Analysis Of Meg Eeg Data, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/pmc08642443-285-12-5?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab-based in-house toolbox for statistical analysis of meg-eeg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg and mri data processing, analysis, and statistics  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc meg and mri data processing, analysis, and statistics
Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.
Meg And Mri Data Processing, Analysis, And Statistics, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/meg+data+analysis/pmc07416058-110-1-12?v=MathWorks+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg and mri data processing, analysis, and statistics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Parallel and dynamic attention allocation during natural reading

doi: 10.1101/2025.05.27.656336

Figure Lengend Snippet: Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

Article Snippet: The MEG data analysis was conducted using MATLAB R2020a (Mathworks Inc, USA), incorporating the FieldTrip toolbox (version 20200220; Oostenveld et al., 2011), the FLUX MEG analysis pipeline , and custom-made scripts.

Techniques:

Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.

Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

Article Title: Editorial: From Raw MEG/EEG to Publication: How to Perform MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Free Academic Software

doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.854471

Figure Lengend Snippet: Article part of the special issue by order of publication date.

Article Snippet: BrainWave: A MATLAB Toolbox for Beamformer Source Analysis of MEG Data , Jobst et al. , Brainwave site , GNU/ GPL , MEG , Beamformer , MATLAB , , Yes.

Techniques: Software, Functional Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Activity Assay, Selection, Imaging