Review





Similar Products

96
Coherent Corp spatial light modulator meadowlark hspdm 1k coherent monaco 2p stimulation laser coherent
Spatial Light Modulator Meadowlark Hspdm 1k Coherent Monaco 2p Stimulation Laser Coherent, supplied by Coherent Corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial light modulator meadowlark hspdm 1k coherent monaco 2p stimulation laser coherent/product/Coherent Corp
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial light modulator meadowlark hspdm 1k coherent monaco 2p stimulation laser coherent - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
EKB Technologies Ltd spatial visual stimulator module dlp® light craftertm 4500 modified by ekb
Spatial Visual Stimulator Module Dlp® Light Craftertm 4500 Modified By Ekb, supplied by EKB Technologies Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial visual stimulator module dlp® light craftertm 4500 modified by ekb/product/EKB Technologies Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial visual stimulator module dlp® light craftertm 4500 modified by ekb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Axion BioSystems multi-well light stimulation system lumos 24
Multi Well Light Stimulation System Lumos 24, supplied by Axion BioSystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multi-well light stimulation system lumos 24/product/Axion BioSystems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multi-well light stimulation system lumos 24 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Diagnosys LLC light-emitting diode photo stimulator model colordome ganzfield
Light Emitting Diode Photo Stimulator Model Colordome Ganzfield, supplied by Diagnosys LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/light-emitting diode photo stimulator model colordome ganzfield/product/Diagnosys LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
light-emitting diode photo stimulator model colordome ganzfield - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
NEWDOON Inc light stimulation
Light Stimulation, supplied by NEWDOON Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/light stimulation/product/NEWDOON Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
light stimulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thorlabs light stimulator
Light Stimulator, supplied by Thorlabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/light stimulator/product/Thorlabs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
light stimulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Osram Sylvania light stimulator
Light Stimulator, supplied by Osram Sylvania, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/light stimulator/product/Osram Sylvania
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
light stimulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thorlabs fiber-coupled light-emitting diodes (leds) for optogenetic stimulation m530f2
Fiber Coupled Light Emitting Diodes (Leds) For Optogenetic Stimulation M530f2, supplied by Thorlabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fiber-coupled light-emitting diodes (leds) for optogenetic stimulation m530f2/product/Thorlabs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fiber-coupled light-emitting diodes (leds) for optogenetic stimulation m530f2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Landauer Inc landauer-in-light optically stimulated luminescence (osl) dosimeter composed of carbon-doped aluminium oxide
Landauer In Light Optically Stimulated Luminescence (Osl) Dosimeter Composed Of Carbon Doped Aluminium Oxide, supplied by Landauer Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/landauer-in-light optically stimulated luminescence (osl) dosimeter composed of carbon-doped aluminium oxide/product/Landauer Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
landauer-in-light optically stimulated luminescence (osl) dosimeter composed of carbon-doped aluminium oxide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thorlabs led light stimulation (470
a , Experimental set up (top), BTSP protocol (middle) and raw traces of EPSPs (ten recordings and average) before and after BTSP protocol (bottom). b , Fluorescence lifetime images (top) and time course (bottom) of a dendritic segment expressing 2dV-Camui during BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). c , Representative traces (top) and all dendrites (bottom) for which fluorescence lifetime changes of 2dV-Camui were measured after BTSP (left) and no <t>stimulation</t> (no stim, right). Shaded region, BTSP protocol. d , Frequency of DDSC onsets after BTSP and cBTSP induction compared with uncaging only (uncage), current injection only (depol) and no stimulation controls. e , Cumulative frequency of d . Two-sided Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Bonferroni’s correction, P = 0.00032 for BTSP versus uncage; P = 0.0000072 for BTSP versus depol; P = 0.00000026 for BTSP versus no stim; and P = 0.12 for BTSP versus cBTSP. f , g , Averaged time course ( f ) and area under the curve (30–40 s after BTSP) ( g ) of lifetime change of CaMKII activity under all five conditions. Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. in f and median and second quartile along with individual values in g . Two-way ANOVA ( F 4,100 = 5.434, P = 0.0005) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). NS, not significant. h , Fluorescence lifetime images of 2dV lifetime changes before (−2 s) and after (+50 s) BTSP protocol at secondary dendrites or soma. i , Representative 2dV-Camui traces of dendrite and of soma or primary dendrites from eight different cells. If the soma was not in the same z plane as the stimulated dendrite, the primary dendrite was used. j , Pie chart showing percentage of recordings that showed an increase in CaMKII activity either in both stimulated dendrite and soma (or primary dendrite) or specifically in the dendrites. k , Amplitude of DDSC in BTSP-induced dendrites and in soma or primary dendrites. The data are presented as the mean and individual values. Two-tailed paired t -test ( t 19 = 4.924, P = 0.000094). Plus symbol in images depicts the BTSP-stimulated spine. Number of dendrites are mentioned in the figure panels in parentheses wherever appropriate. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. Scale bars, 2.5 μm ( b ) or 5 μm ( h ).
Led Light Stimulation (470, supplied by Thorlabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/led light stimulation (470/product/Thorlabs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
led light stimulation (470 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a , Experimental set up (top), BTSP protocol (middle) and raw traces of EPSPs (ten recordings and average) before and after BTSP protocol (bottom). b , Fluorescence lifetime images (top) and time course (bottom) of a dendritic segment expressing 2dV-Camui during BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). c , Representative traces (top) and all dendrites (bottom) for which fluorescence lifetime changes of 2dV-Camui were measured after BTSP (left) and no stimulation (no stim, right). Shaded region, BTSP protocol. d , Frequency of DDSC onsets after BTSP and cBTSP induction compared with uncaging only (uncage), current injection only (depol) and no stimulation controls. e , Cumulative frequency of d . Two-sided Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Bonferroni’s correction, P = 0.00032 for BTSP versus uncage; P = 0.0000072 for BTSP versus depol; P = 0.00000026 for BTSP versus no stim; and P = 0.12 for BTSP versus cBTSP. f , g , Averaged time course ( f ) and area under the curve (30–40 s after BTSP) ( g ) of lifetime change of CaMKII activity under all five conditions. Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. in f and median and second quartile along with individual values in g . Two-way ANOVA ( F 4,100 = 5.434, P = 0.0005) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). NS, not significant. h , Fluorescence lifetime images of 2dV lifetime changes before (−2 s) and after (+50 s) BTSP protocol at secondary dendrites or soma. i , Representative 2dV-Camui traces of dendrite and of soma or primary dendrites from eight different cells. If the soma was not in the same z plane as the stimulated dendrite, the primary dendrite was used. j , Pie chart showing percentage of recordings that showed an increase in CaMKII activity either in both stimulated dendrite and soma (or primary dendrite) or specifically in the dendrites. k , Amplitude of DDSC in BTSP-induced dendrites and in soma or primary dendrites. The data are presented as the mean and individual values. Two-tailed paired t -test ( t 19 = 4.924, P = 0.000094). Plus symbol in images depicts the BTSP-stimulated spine. Number of dendrites are mentioned in the figure panels in parentheses wherever appropriate. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. Scale bars, 2.5 μm ( b ) or 5 μm ( h ).

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Dendritic, delayed, stochastic CaMKII activation in behavioural time scale plasticity

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08021-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Experimental set up (top), BTSP protocol (middle) and raw traces of EPSPs (ten recordings and average) before and after BTSP protocol (bottom). b , Fluorescence lifetime images (top) and time course (bottom) of a dendritic segment expressing 2dV-Camui during BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). c , Representative traces (top) and all dendrites (bottom) for which fluorescence lifetime changes of 2dV-Camui were measured after BTSP (left) and no stimulation (no stim, right). Shaded region, BTSP protocol. d , Frequency of DDSC onsets after BTSP and cBTSP induction compared with uncaging only (uncage), current injection only (depol) and no stimulation controls. e , Cumulative frequency of d . Two-sided Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Bonferroni’s correction, P = 0.00032 for BTSP versus uncage; P = 0.0000072 for BTSP versus depol; P = 0.00000026 for BTSP versus no stim; and P = 0.12 for BTSP versus cBTSP. f , g , Averaged time course ( f ) and area under the curve (30–40 s after BTSP) ( g ) of lifetime change of CaMKII activity under all five conditions. Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. in f and median and second quartile along with individual values in g . Two-way ANOVA ( F 4,100 = 5.434, P = 0.0005) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). NS, not significant. h , Fluorescence lifetime images of 2dV lifetime changes before (−2 s) and after (+50 s) BTSP protocol at secondary dendrites or soma. i , Representative 2dV-Camui traces of dendrite and of soma or primary dendrites from eight different cells. If the soma was not in the same z plane as the stimulated dendrite, the primary dendrite was used. j , Pie chart showing percentage of recordings that showed an increase in CaMKII activity either in both stimulated dendrite and soma (or primary dendrite) or specifically in the dendrites. k , Amplitude of DDSC in BTSP-induced dendrites and in soma or primary dendrites. The data are presented as the mean and individual values. Two-tailed paired t -test ( t 19 = 4.924, P = 0.000094). Plus symbol in images depicts the BTSP-stimulated spine. Number of dendrites are mentioned in the figure panels in parentheses wherever appropriate. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. Scale bars, 2.5 μm ( b ) or 5 μm ( h ).

Article Snippet: LED light stimulation (470 nm, M470L5, Thorlabs) was used to activate paAIP2.

Techniques: Fluorescence, Expressing, Injection, Activity Assay, Comparison, Two Tailed Test

a , Left: Representative dendritic 2dV-Camui recordings in basal dendrites before induction of BTSP. Right: All 2dV-Camui recordings (filtered) before BTSP induction. b , Same as (a) , but performed after BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). c , Same as (a) , but performed in corresponding proximal apical dendrites after BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). d , Frequency of DDSC onsets after BTSP induction in apical (orange) and basal dendrites (red) compared with no stimulation (black) controls. e , Cumulative frequency of (d) . Two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Boenhoffer’s correction, basal vs apical p = 1.0; basal vs no stim p = 0.018. The number of dendrites is mentioned in the figure panels. *p < 0.05.

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Dendritic, delayed, stochastic CaMKII activation in behavioural time scale plasticity

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08021-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Left: Representative dendritic 2dV-Camui recordings in basal dendrites before induction of BTSP. Right: All 2dV-Camui recordings (filtered) before BTSP induction. b , Same as (a) , but performed after BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). c , Same as (a) , but performed in corresponding proximal apical dendrites after BTSP induction (shaded region, BTSP protocol). d , Frequency of DDSC onsets after BTSP induction in apical (orange) and basal dendrites (red) compared with no stimulation (black) controls. e , Cumulative frequency of (d) . Two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Boenhoffer’s correction, basal vs apical p = 1.0; basal vs no stim p = 0.018. The number of dendrites is mentioned in the figure panels. *p < 0.05.

Article Snippet: LED light stimulation (470 nm, M470L5, Thorlabs) was used to activate paAIP2.

Techniques:

a , Left, schematic of the photoactivatable CaMKII inhibitor paAIP2, which inhibits CaMKII after blue light (BL, 470 nm) exposure and becomes inactive within about 40 s when BL is stopped. Right, paAIP2-P2A-mEGFP-labelled CA1 neurons. Scale bar, 50 μm. b , Schematic of two separate CaMKII inhibition experiments shown in c , e and f . CaMKII was inhibited for 2 mins, 0 s (black) or 30 s (blue) after the BTSP protocol (orange). c , Representative EPSP traces of a stimulated spine (average of ten recordings) before and after BTSP induction in paAIP2-labelled neurons for which no BL stimulation was given (orange), or BL was given with 0 s delay (black) or 30 s delay (blue). d – g , Normalized time course ( d – f ) and summary of magnitude of EPSP potentiation (25–30 min) ( g ) in stimulated and adjacent spines for no BL ( n = 17; d ), BL with 0 s delay ( n = 10; e ), BL with 15 s delay ( n = 10) or BL with 30 s delay ( n = 11; f ). Two way ANOVA ( F 7,68 = 4.94, P = 0.0001) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). h , Top, BTSP protocol in voltage clamp (BTSPvc), for which 5 uncaging pulses (1 Hz) were paired with depolarization to 0 mV for 300 ms with 750 ms delay in the presence of TTX. Middle, protocol to artificially induce delayed CaMKII activity by applying additional long (20 s) depolarization 10–12 s after BTSPvc (BTSPvc+depol). Bottom, 5 uncaging pulses were paired with long depolarization 10–12 s after uncaging (uncage+depol). i , Representative EPSC traces of stimulated spine (average of 10 recordings) before and 20 min after BTSPvc, BTSPvc+depol and uncage+depol. j , k , Normalized EPSC amplitude time course ( j ) and summary of magnitude of potentiation ( k ) of stimulated and adjacent spines during BTSPvc ( n = 10), BTSPvc+depol (stim, n = 19; adj, n = 11) and uncage+depol (stim, n = 14; adj, n = 13). Two-way ANOVA ( F 5,53 = 4.9, P = 0.0009) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). The data in d – g , j and k are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Number of cells are mentioned in the panels in parentheses wherever appropriate. Arrows depict BTSP, BTSPvc or uncaging induction. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001.

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Dendritic, delayed, stochastic CaMKII activation in behavioural time scale plasticity

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08021-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Left, schematic of the photoactivatable CaMKII inhibitor paAIP2, which inhibits CaMKII after blue light (BL, 470 nm) exposure and becomes inactive within about 40 s when BL is stopped. Right, paAIP2-P2A-mEGFP-labelled CA1 neurons. Scale bar, 50 μm. b , Schematic of two separate CaMKII inhibition experiments shown in c , e and f . CaMKII was inhibited for 2 mins, 0 s (black) or 30 s (blue) after the BTSP protocol (orange). c , Representative EPSP traces of a stimulated spine (average of ten recordings) before and after BTSP induction in paAIP2-labelled neurons for which no BL stimulation was given (orange), or BL was given with 0 s delay (black) or 30 s delay (blue). d – g , Normalized time course ( d – f ) and summary of magnitude of EPSP potentiation (25–30 min) ( g ) in stimulated and adjacent spines for no BL ( n = 17; d ), BL with 0 s delay ( n = 10; e ), BL with 15 s delay ( n = 10) or BL with 30 s delay ( n = 11; f ). Two way ANOVA ( F 7,68 = 4.94, P = 0.0001) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). h , Top, BTSP protocol in voltage clamp (BTSPvc), for which 5 uncaging pulses (1 Hz) were paired with depolarization to 0 mV for 300 ms with 750 ms delay in the presence of TTX. Middle, protocol to artificially induce delayed CaMKII activity by applying additional long (20 s) depolarization 10–12 s after BTSPvc (BTSPvc+depol). Bottom, 5 uncaging pulses were paired with long depolarization 10–12 s after uncaging (uncage+depol). i , Representative EPSC traces of stimulated spine (average of 10 recordings) before and 20 min after BTSPvc, BTSPvc+depol and uncage+depol. j , k , Normalized EPSC amplitude time course ( j ) and summary of magnitude of potentiation ( k ) of stimulated and adjacent spines during BTSPvc ( n = 10), BTSPvc+depol (stim, n = 19; adj, n = 11) and uncage+depol (stim, n = 14; adj, n = 13). Two-way ANOVA ( F 5,53 = 4.9, P = 0.0009) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (all P values are shown in the source data file). The data in d – g , j and k are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Number of cells are mentioned in the panels in parentheses wherever appropriate. Arrows depict BTSP, BTSPvc or uncaging induction. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: LED light stimulation (470 nm, M470L5, Thorlabs) was used to activate paAIP2.

Techniques: Inhibition, Comparison, Activity Assay