Review





Similar Products

94
Miltenyi Biotec anti mouse lamp1
Anti Mouse Lamp1, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/CD107a+(LAMP-1)+Antibody%2C+anti-mouse%2C+REAfinity/pmc13637965-849-0-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse lamp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bioss mouse anti lamp1 antibody
Mouse Anti Lamp1 Antibody, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/LAMP-1+Polyclonal+Antibody/pm42106834-233-62-65
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti lamp1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Coralite Dental Products rat coralite plus 488 anti mouse lamp1 antibody
BAITs promote DC activation and antigen presentation via enhanced lysosomal processing. (A) Schematic for MHC Ⅰ/Ⅱ immunostaining. DCs were treated with antigens or BAITs (12 h), then incubated in fresh medium (with TGFβ) for 24 h before staining. (B, C) Quantification of surface MHC Ⅰ (B) and MHC Ⅱ (C) on DCs (n = 8; n.s. is P > 0.05, ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (D, E) Representative immunofluorescence images of DCs (blue: nuclei; yellow: <t>LAMP1;</t> green: MHC Ⅰ; magenta: MHC Ⅱ). BAIT-treated DCs show strong surface MHC and minimal intracellular antigen signal, whereas antigen-treated DCs show retained antigen (red) and weak surface MHC signal. (F–H) Flow cytometric analysis of MHC Ⅰ (F), MHC Ⅱ (G), and CD80 (H) expression on murine CD11c + DCs after exposure to antigens or BAITs. (I) Quantification of MHC Ⅰ, MHC Ⅱ, and CD80 expression in DCs by flow cytometry (n = 3; ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (J) Heatmap of DC activation-related gene expression after treatment with antigens or BAITs, highlighting upregulation of maturation and antigen presentation genes and downregulation of immunosuppressive genes by BAITs (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Rat Coralite Plus 488 Anti Mouse Lamp1 Antibody, supplied by Coralite Dental Products, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/488+anti+coralite+lamp1+mouse+plus+rat/pmc13191106-394-46-47
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat coralite plus 488 anti mouse lamp1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech lamp1 rat anti lamp1
BAITs promote DC activation and antigen presentation via enhanced lysosomal processing. (A) Schematic for MHC Ⅰ/Ⅱ immunostaining. DCs were treated with antigens or BAITs (12 h), then incubated in fresh medium (with TGFβ) for 24 h before staining. (B, C) Quantification of surface MHC Ⅰ (B) and MHC Ⅱ (C) on DCs (n = 8; n.s. is P > 0.05, ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (D, E) Representative immunofluorescence images of DCs (blue: nuclei; yellow: <t>LAMP1;</t> green: MHC Ⅰ; magenta: MHC Ⅱ). BAIT-treated DCs show strong surface MHC and minimal intracellular antigen signal, whereas antigen-treated DCs show retained antigen (red) and weak surface MHC signal. (F–H) Flow cytometric analysis of MHC Ⅰ (F), MHC Ⅱ (G), and CD80 (H) expression on murine CD11c + DCs after exposure to antigens or BAITs. (I) Quantification of MHC Ⅰ, MHC Ⅱ, and CD80 expression in DCs by flow cytometry (n = 3; ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (J) Heatmap of DC activation-related gene expression after treatment with antigens or BAITs, highlighting upregulation of maturation and antigen presentation genes and downregulation of immunosuppressive genes by BAITs (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Lamp1 Rat Anti Lamp1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/Anti-mouse+CD107a/10__1016_slash_j__arres__2026__100198-92-1-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lamp1 rat anti lamp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech lamp1
CSPG5 regulates ErbB2 stability via the lysosomal degradation pathway. ( A ) The heatmap shows the correlation of CSPG5 protein expression and ErbB family member activation in glioma of CPTAC dataset. Dot size = protein expression abundance. CPTAC grade distribution: 22 grade II, 30 grade III, 36 grade IV. ( B ) Linear regression analysis of CSPG5 and ErbB receptors protein expression levels. ( C ) qRT-PCR analysis of ErbB2 and ErbB3 in vector and CSPG5 overexpression GL261 cells. ( D ) CSPG5 overexpression and vector transfected GL261 cells were treated with 25 µg/mL of CHX for the indicated time points and ErbB2 protein levels were determined by Immunoblotting. Shown are ErbB2 levels normalized to α-tubulin and relative to 0 h timepoint. ( E ) Half-lives (T1/2) represent the time required for ErbB2 to decrease to 50% of its initial level. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent experiments (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance, by two-way ANOVA test). ( F ) ErbB2 is primarily degraded through the lysosomal pathway. GL261 cells were treated with MG132 (10 µM) or chloroquine (50 µM) for 4 h to inhibit proteasome and lysosome activities. The expression of ErbB2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. ( G-H ) Confocal microscopy imaging of colocalization of ErbB2 (G) or ErbB3 (H) with lysosomes in vector and cspg5 overexpression GL261 cells
Lamp1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/CoraLite+647-conjugated+Anti-mouse+CD107a/pmc13681961-83-40-41
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lamp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Progen Biotechnik mouse anti lamp1 antibodies
CSPG5 regulates ErbB2 stability via the lysosomal degradation pathway. ( A ) The heatmap shows the correlation of CSPG5 protein expression and ErbB family member activation in glioma of CPTAC dataset. Dot size = protein expression abundance. CPTAC grade distribution: 22 grade II, 30 grade III, 36 grade IV. ( B ) Linear regression analysis of CSPG5 and ErbB receptors protein expression levels. ( C ) qRT-PCR analysis of ErbB2 and ErbB3 in vector and CSPG5 overexpression GL261 cells. ( D ) CSPG5 overexpression and vector transfected GL261 cells were treated with 25 µg/mL of CHX for the indicated time points and ErbB2 protein levels were determined by Immunoblotting. Shown are ErbB2 levels normalized to α-tubulin and relative to 0 h timepoint. ( E ) Half-lives (T1/2) represent the time required for ErbB2 to decrease to 50% of its initial level. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent experiments (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance, by two-way ANOVA test). ( F ) ErbB2 is primarily degraded through the lysosomal pathway. GL261 cells were treated with MG132 (10 µM) or chloroquine (50 µM) for 4 h to inhibit proteasome and lysosome activities. The expression of ErbB2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. ( G-H ) Confocal microscopy imaging of colocalization of ErbB2 (G) or ErbB3 (H) with lysosomes in vector and cspg5 overexpression GL261 cells
Mouse Anti Lamp1 Antibodies, supplied by Progen Biotechnik, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/anti+lamp1+mouse/10__1080_slash_0886022x__2026__2670806-38-26-32
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti lamp1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti lamp1
CSPG5 regulates ErbB2 stability via the lysosomal degradation pathway. ( A ) The heatmap shows the correlation of CSPG5 protein expression and ErbB family member activation in glioma of CPTAC dataset. Dot size = protein expression abundance. CPTAC grade distribution: 22 grade II, 30 grade III, 36 grade IV. ( B ) Linear regression analysis of CSPG5 and ErbB receptors protein expression levels. ( C ) qRT-PCR analysis of ErbB2 and ErbB3 in vector and CSPG5 overexpression GL261 cells. ( D ) CSPG5 overexpression and vector transfected GL261 cells were treated with 25 µg/mL of CHX for the indicated time points and ErbB2 protein levels were determined by Immunoblotting. Shown are ErbB2 levels normalized to α-tubulin and relative to 0 h timepoint. ( E ) Half-lives (T1/2) represent the time required for ErbB2 to decrease to 50% of its initial level. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent experiments (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance, by two-way ANOVA test). ( F ) ErbB2 is primarily degraded through the lysosomal pathway. GL261 cells were treated with MG132 (10 µM) or chloroquine (50 µM) for 4 h to inhibit proteasome and lysosome activities. The expression of ErbB2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. ( G-H ) Confocal microscopy imaging of colocalization of ErbB2 (G) or ErbB3 (H) with lysosomes in vector and cspg5 overexpression GL261 cells
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Lamp1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+lamp1/LAMP-1+Antibody/pmc13016079-12-0-4
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti lamp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


BAITs promote DC activation and antigen presentation via enhanced lysosomal processing. (A) Schematic for MHC Ⅰ/Ⅱ immunostaining. DCs were treated with antigens or BAITs (12 h), then incubated in fresh medium (with TGFβ) for 24 h before staining. (B, C) Quantification of surface MHC Ⅰ (B) and MHC Ⅱ (C) on DCs (n = 8; n.s. is P > 0.05, ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (D, E) Representative immunofluorescence images of DCs (blue: nuclei; yellow: LAMP1; green: MHC Ⅰ; magenta: MHC Ⅱ). BAIT-treated DCs show strong surface MHC and minimal intracellular antigen signal, whereas antigen-treated DCs show retained antigen (red) and weak surface MHC signal. (F–H) Flow cytometric analysis of MHC Ⅰ (F), MHC Ⅱ (G), and CD80 (H) expression on murine CD11c + DCs after exposure to antigens or BAITs. (I) Quantification of MHC Ⅰ, MHC Ⅱ, and CD80 expression in DCs by flow cytometry (n = 3; ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (J) Heatmap of DC activation-related gene expression after treatment with antigens or BAITs, highlighting upregulation of maturation and antigen presentation genes and downregulation of immunosuppressive genes by BAITs (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Countering postoperative immune suppression with a self-assembling dendritic cell nanovaccine

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.05.005

Figure Lengend Snippet: BAITs promote DC activation and antigen presentation via enhanced lysosomal processing. (A) Schematic for MHC Ⅰ/Ⅱ immunostaining. DCs were treated with antigens or BAITs (12 h), then incubated in fresh medium (with TGFβ) for 24 h before staining. (B, C) Quantification of surface MHC Ⅰ (B) and MHC Ⅱ (C) on DCs (n = 8; n.s. is P > 0.05, ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (D, E) Representative immunofluorescence images of DCs (blue: nuclei; yellow: LAMP1; green: MHC Ⅰ; magenta: MHC Ⅱ). BAIT-treated DCs show strong surface MHC and minimal intracellular antigen signal, whereas antigen-treated DCs show retained antigen (red) and weak surface MHC signal. (F–H) Flow cytometric analysis of MHC Ⅰ (F), MHC Ⅱ (G), and CD80 (H) expression on murine CD11c + DCs after exposure to antigens or BAITs. (I) Quantification of MHC Ⅰ, MHC Ⅱ, and CD80 expression in DCs by flow cytometry (n = 3; ∗∗∗ is P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ is P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). (J) Heatmap of DC activation-related gene expression after treatment with antigens or BAITs, highlighting upregulation of maturation and antigen presentation genes and downregulation of immunosuppressive genes by BAITs (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Article Snippet: After treatment, the cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. For intracellular protein staining, fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 10 min. Next, the cells were blocked with 2% BSA and incubated with rat CoraLite Plus 488 anti-mouse LAMP1 antibody (1:200) and rabbit anti-mouse pSAP (1:200) antibody overnight at 4 °C.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Immunopeptidomics, Immunostaining, Incubation, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Gene Expression

CSPG5 regulates ErbB2 stability via the lysosomal degradation pathway. ( A ) The heatmap shows the correlation of CSPG5 protein expression and ErbB family member activation in glioma of CPTAC dataset. Dot size = protein expression abundance. CPTAC grade distribution: 22 grade II, 30 grade III, 36 grade IV. ( B ) Linear regression analysis of CSPG5 and ErbB receptors protein expression levels. ( C ) qRT-PCR analysis of ErbB2 and ErbB3 in vector and CSPG5 overexpression GL261 cells. ( D ) CSPG5 overexpression and vector transfected GL261 cells were treated with 25 µg/mL of CHX for the indicated time points and ErbB2 protein levels were determined by Immunoblotting. Shown are ErbB2 levels normalized to α-tubulin and relative to 0 h timepoint. ( E ) Half-lives (T1/2) represent the time required for ErbB2 to decrease to 50% of its initial level. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent experiments (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance, by two-way ANOVA test). ( F ) ErbB2 is primarily degraded through the lysosomal pathway. GL261 cells were treated with MG132 (10 µM) or chloroquine (50 µM) for 4 h to inhibit proteasome and lysosome activities. The expression of ErbB2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. ( G-H ) Confocal microscopy imaging of colocalization of ErbB2 (G) or ErbB3 (H) with lysosomes in vector and cspg5 overexpression GL261 cells

Journal: Cancer Cell International

Article Title: Quantitative proteomic landscape reveals the role of CSPG5 in the recurrence of glioma

doi: 10.1186/s12935-026-04430-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: CSPG5 regulates ErbB2 stability via the lysosomal degradation pathway. ( A ) The heatmap shows the correlation of CSPG5 protein expression and ErbB family member activation in glioma of CPTAC dataset. Dot size = protein expression abundance. CPTAC grade distribution: 22 grade II, 30 grade III, 36 grade IV. ( B ) Linear regression analysis of CSPG5 and ErbB receptors protein expression levels. ( C ) qRT-PCR analysis of ErbB2 and ErbB3 in vector and CSPG5 overexpression GL261 cells. ( D ) CSPG5 overexpression and vector transfected GL261 cells were treated with 25 µg/mL of CHX for the indicated time points and ErbB2 protein levels were determined by Immunoblotting. Shown are ErbB2 levels normalized to α-tubulin and relative to 0 h timepoint. ( E ) Half-lives (T1/2) represent the time required for ErbB2 to decrease to 50% of its initial level. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent experiments (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance, by two-way ANOVA test). ( F ) ErbB2 is primarily degraded through the lysosomal pathway. GL261 cells were treated with MG132 (10 µM) or chloroquine (50 µM) for 4 h to inhibit proteasome and lysosome activities. The expression of ErbB2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. ( G-H ) Confocal microscopy imaging of colocalization of ErbB2 (G) or ErbB3 (H) with lysosomes in vector and cspg5 overexpression GL261 cells

Article Snippet: Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min, and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min and blocked with 5% goat serum for 60 min. Staining was performed using primary antibodies: anti-ErbB2 (Proteintech,18299-1-AP,1:200dilution), anti-ErbB3 (CellSignalingTechnology,12708,1:100dilution), LAMP1 (Proteintech; CL647-65050, 1:500 dilution ), V5 (Elabscience; E-AB-20010;1:1000 dilution).

Techniques: Stability, Expressing, Activation Assay, Analysis, Quantitative RT-PCR, Plasmid Preparation, Over Expression, Transfection, Western Blot, Confocal, Microscopy, Imaging