Review





Similar Products

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against phospho jak2 tyr1007 1008
Antibodies Against Phospho Jak2 Tyr1007 1008, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/Phospho-Jak2+(Tyr1007%2F1008)+Antibody/pmc13673060-199-31-35
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against phospho jak2 tyr1007 1008 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc jak2
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Jak2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/Jak2+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13673060-199-37-38
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
jak2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti total jak2
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Anti Total Jak2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/Jak2+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pm42817007-337-23-25
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti total jak2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ABclonal Biotechnology p jak2
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
P Jak2, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/Phospho-Jak2-Y1007%2F1008+Rabbit+pAb/pm42790543-97-55-57
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p jak2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ABclonal Biotechnology pjak2
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Pjak2, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/Phospho-Jak2-Y1007%2F1008+Rabbit+pAb/pm42745263-176-39-40
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pjak2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ABclonal Biotechnology jak2
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Jak2, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/JAK2+Rabbit+pAb/pm42745263-176-33-34
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
jak2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ABclonal Biotechnology anti jak2
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Anti Jak2, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/JAK2+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13527042-104-54-57
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti jak2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Abbexa Ltd rabbit anti phospho jak2 py1007
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Rabbit Anti Phospho Jak2 Py1007, supplied by Abbexa Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/JAK2+(pT1007)+Antibody/pm42472615-120-14-18
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti phospho jak2 py1007 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ABclonal Biotechnology anti jak2(a7694)
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Anti Jak2(a7694), supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/JAK2+Rabbit+pAb/pm42636684-71-0-9
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti jak2(a7694) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ABclonal Biotechnology p jak2 ap0373
IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, <t>JAK2,</t> p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
P Jak2 Ap0373, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+jak2/Phospho-JAK2-Y1007+Rabbit+pAb/pm42636684-71-3-9
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p jak2 ap0373 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, JAK2, p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Gut Microbiota‐Derived Indole‐3‐Acetaldehyde Contributes to the Disease‐Alleviating Effects of Kurarinone in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

doi: 10.1002/advs.78358

Figure Lengend Snippet: IAAld suppresses Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in an AhR‐dependent manner by repressing JAK/STAT signaling. (A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the intersectional targets of IAAld and MS. (B) In silico prediction of the binding interaction between IAAld and AhR by molecular docking. The calculated binding energy (BE) is −6.6 kcal/mol (inset: chemical structure of IAAld). (C,D) Flow cytometric quantification and representative plots of CD4 + IFNγ + (Th1) and CD4 + IL‑17A + (Th17) cells under in vitro differentiation conditions across PBS, IAAld (10 µM), and IAAld+siAhR (AhR knockdown by siRNA) groups ( n = 3 per group). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of AhR (green) in Th1 and Th17 cells of each group, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Western blot analysis showing protein levels of AhR, p‑JAK2, JAK2, p‑STAT4, STAT4, p‑STAT3, STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, and GAPDH in Th1 (left) and Th17 (right) cells. (G) Quantitative analysis of AhR/GAPDH ratio, p‐JAK2/JAK2 ratio, p‐STAT4/STAT4 ratio, p‐STAT3/STAT3 ratio, SOCS1/GAPDH ratio and SOCS3/GAPDH ratio in each group ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: SDS loading buffer (Deeyeebio, 50053) was added to the cell lysis solution, and the proteins (30 μg/lane) were separated by SDS‐PAGE and transferred onto the PVDF membrane, and probed with primary antibodies against phospho‐JAK2 (Tyr1007/1008) (CST, 3771), JAK2 (CST, 3230), phospho‐STAT3 (Ser705) (CST, 9145), phospho‐STAT4 (Tyr693) (CST, 4134), STAT3 (Proteintech, 10253‐2‐ap), STAT4 (CST, 2653), SOCS1 (CST, 55313), SOCS3 (Proteintech, 14025‐1‐ap), and AhR (Proteintech, 67785‐1‐lg), followed by HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies (Proteintech, SA00001‐1, SA00001‐2).

Techniques: Cell Differentiation, Analysis, In Silico, Binding Assay, Docking Assay, In Vitro, Knockdown, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Western Blot, Significance Assay

Graphical abstract. Schematic diagram illustrating the molecular mechanism by which KU ameliorates EAE through the gut microbiota‐IAAld‐AhR axis. KU reshapes gut microbiota composition in EAE mice, specifically increasing the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila . A. muciniphila facilitates intestinal production of indole‐3‐acetaldehyde (IAAld) and the latter crosses the intestinal barrier to enter peripheral circulation and CNS, where IAAld activates AhR and promotes its nuclear translocation in CD4 + T cells. Once in the nucleus, activated AhR upregulates SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression and suppresses phosphorylation of JAK2 and its downstream targets, STAT4 and STAT3. This cascade restrains CD4 + T cell differentiation into Th1 and Th17 subsets, ultimately mitigating CNS inflammation and demyelination in EAE mice.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Gut Microbiota‐Derived Indole‐3‐Acetaldehyde Contributes to the Disease‐Alleviating Effects of Kurarinone in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

doi: 10.1002/advs.78358

Figure Lengend Snippet: Graphical abstract. Schematic diagram illustrating the molecular mechanism by which KU ameliorates EAE through the gut microbiota‐IAAld‐AhR axis. KU reshapes gut microbiota composition in EAE mice, specifically increasing the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila . A. muciniphila facilitates intestinal production of indole‐3‐acetaldehyde (IAAld) and the latter crosses the intestinal barrier to enter peripheral circulation and CNS, where IAAld activates AhR and promotes its nuclear translocation in CD4 + T cells. Once in the nucleus, activated AhR upregulates SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression and suppresses phosphorylation of JAK2 and its downstream targets, STAT4 and STAT3. This cascade restrains CD4 + T cell differentiation into Th1 and Th17 subsets, ultimately mitigating CNS inflammation and demyelination in EAE mice.

Article Snippet: SDS loading buffer (Deeyeebio, 50053) was added to the cell lysis solution, and the proteins (30 μg/lane) were separated by SDS‐PAGE and transferred onto the PVDF membrane, and probed with primary antibodies against phospho‐JAK2 (Tyr1007/1008) (CST, 3771), JAK2 (CST, 3230), phospho‐STAT3 (Ser705) (CST, 9145), phospho‐STAT4 (Tyr693) (CST, 4134), STAT3 (Proteintech, 10253‐2‐ap), STAT4 (CST, 2653), SOCS1 (CST, 55313), SOCS3 (Proteintech, 14025‐1‐ap), and AhR (Proteintech, 67785‐1‐lg), followed by HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies (Proteintech, SA00001‐1, SA00001‐2).

Techniques: Translocation Assay, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Cell Differentiation